Table 4.
General linear regression model predicting weight loss at post-intervention
Variable | Estimate | Standard error | t value | Pr > |t| |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.8607 | 1.210 | 0.71 | 0.478 |
Worksite | ||||
Academic vs. SS | −0.541 | 0.562 | −0.96 | 0.338 |
HC vs. SS | −0.760 | 0.524 | −1.45 | 0.149 |
NHHCS vs.SS | −1.425 | 0.598 | −2.38 | 0.019 |
External vs. internal facilitator | 0.317 | 0.412 | 0.77 | 0.443 |
Hawaiian vs. other | −0.014 | 0.433 | −0.03 | 0.975 |
Female vs. male | 0.099 | 0.674 | 0.15 | 0.883 |
Less than college vs. ≥college | 0.294 | 0.412 | 0.71 | 0.477 |
Baseline weight | −0.018 | 0.009 | −1.95 | 0.053 |
Change in diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.086 | 0.024 | 3.63 | <0.001 |
Change in physical activity frequency Score | 0.577 | 0.167 | 3.46 | <0.001 |
Change in community support | −0.151 | 0.070 | −2.15 | 0.033 |
Change in locus of weight control | −0.228 | 0.099 | −2.29 | 0.023 |
For overall model fitting, R 2 = 0.265, F(12,144) = 4.36, p < 0.0001
Baseline weight variables were first transformed by grand mean centering before entering the general linear regression model. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for Tukey procedure.