Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 19;6(2):190–201. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0383-3

Table 4.

General linear regression model predicting weight loss at post-intervention

Variable Estimate Standard error t value Pr > |t|
Intercept 0.8607 1.210 0.71 0.478
Worksite
 Academic vs. SS −0.541 0.562 −0.96 0.338
 HC vs. SS −0.760 0.524 −1.45 0.149
 NHHCS vs.SS −1.425 0.598 −2.38 0.019
External vs. internal facilitator 0.317 0.412 0.77 0.443
Hawaiian vs. other −0.014 0.433 −0.03 0.975
Female vs. male 0.099 0.674 0.15 0.883
Less than college vs. ≥college 0.294 0.412 0.71 0.477
Baseline weight −0.018 0.009 −1.95 0.053
Change in diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 0.086 0.024 3.63 <0.001
Change in physical activity frequency Score 0.577 0.167 3.46 <0.001
Change in community support −0.151 0.070 −2.15 0.033
Change in locus of weight control −0.228 0.099 −2.29 0.023

For overall model fitting, R 2 = 0.265, F(12,144) = 4.36, p < 0.0001

Baseline weight variables were first transformed by grand mean centering before entering the general linear regression model. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for Tukey procedure.