Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 22;6(2):202–211. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0389-5

Table 4.

Patient characteristics, mean %A1C change, and % with clinically important (≥0.5) A1C reduction in intervention and comparison groups

Intervention Comparison p a
N Pre Post Difference ≥0.5 reduction N Pre Post Difference ≥0.5 reduction
M ± SD (range) M ± SD (range) M ± SD (range) % M ± SD (range) M ± SD (range) M ± SD (range) %
Age (years) 491 54.0 ± 12.5 (19.0–85.0) 82 53.1 ± 10.5 (30.0–83.0) 0.57
BMI (kg/m2) 436 36.4 ± 9.3 (17.7–74.2) 64 36.8 ± 8.8 (18.7–59.6) 0.71
%A1Cb 416 8.7 ± 2.5 (5.0–14.1) 63 8.8 ± 1.7 (5.5–14.1) 0.68
%A1C ≥ 7.5 204 10.0 ± 2.1 (7.5–14.1) 9.0 ± 2.0 (5.4–14.0) −1.1 ± 2.4§ (−8.5–5.8) 51 41 9.3 ± 1.3 (7.6–13.0) 8.9 ± 1.7 (5.4–14.0) −0.4 ± 1.8 (−5.0–3.5) 46 0.003
Site A 76 9.4 ± 1.9 (7.5–14.0) 8.7 ± 1.8 (5.4–13.10) −0.8 ± 2.3# (−7.8–3.4) 45 14 9.5 ± 1.3 (7.7–12.1) 9.4 ± 1.9 (6.6–12.6) −0.1 ± 1.4 (−3.0–2.4) 36 0.92
Site B 55 10.3 ± 2.1 (7.5–14.0) 9.4 ± 2.1 (6.0–14.0) −0.9 ± 2.3# (−7.3–5.8) 60 1 10.1 9.6 −0.5
Site C 73 10.4 ± 2.1 (7.5–14.0) 8.9 ± 2.0 (5.5–13.70) −1.5 ± 2.6§ (−8.5–2.4) 52 21 9.3 ± 1.4 (7.6–13.0) 8.3 ± 1.3 (6.1–11.3) −1.0 ± 1.8 (−5.0–3.0) 56 0.005
Site D 5 8.5 ± 0.7 (7.8–9.6) 9.7 ± 2.1 (7.5–11.9) 1.1 ± 1.7 (−0.5–3.5) 20

Descriptive statistics shown were calculated based on all participants with available data. Differences were calculated for participants who had both pre- and post-intervention data on corresponding variables for each site (i.e., post-intervention %A1C minus pre-intervention %A1C)

§ p < 0.001; # p < 0.01, for tests of change within the group

aA p value for a t test comparing the groups at baseline

bGlycosylated hemoglobin A1C laboratory values reported as percentages, where a 0.5 reduction reflects a clinically significant reduction (e.g., 8.0 to 7.5 %)