Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;23:2679–2689. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5191-6

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of 351 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy or primary surgery for esophageal cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy total (n = 214) n (%)* Primary surgery total (n = 137) n (%)*
Age at diagnosis, year [mean ± SD] 63 (8.4) 64 (9.9)
Gender
 Male 171 (80) 93 (68)
 Female 43 (20) 44 (32)
ASA score
 1 49 (23) 35 (26)
 2 136 (64) 70 (51)
 ≥3 29 (14) 32 (23)
Tumor location
 Upper esophagus 3 (1) 0 (0)
 Middle esophagus 30 (14) 29 (21)
 Distal esophagus 105 (49) 62 (45)
 Gastroesophageal junction 76 (36) 46 (34)
Neoadjuvant therapy
 None 0 (0) 137 (100)
 Chemotherapy 103 (48) 0 (0)
 Chemoradiotherapy 111 (52) 0 (0)
Surgical approach
 Transthoracic 176 (82) 84 (61)
 Transhiatal 38 (18) 53 (39)
Histological type
 Adenocarcinoma 175 (82) 92 (67)
 Squamous cell carcinoma 39 (18) 44 (32)
 Other 0 (0) 1 (1)
pT stage
 T0 39 (18) 2 (2)
 T1-2 64 (30) 39 (28)
 T3-4a 111 (51) 96 (70)
pN stage
 N0 108 (51) 46 (34)
 N1 54 (25) 39 (29)
 N2-3 52 (24) 52 (38)
Radicality
 R0 198 (93) 117 (85)
 R1 16 (8) 20 (15)
Referral
 By general practitioner 23 (11) 34 (25)
 By another hospital 191 (89) 103 (75)
Year of diagnosis
 2003–2005 2 (1) 34 (25)
 2006–2008 22 (10) 50 (36)
 2009–2011 91 (43) 33 (24)
 2012–2014 99 (46) 20 (15)

SD standard deviation, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists

* Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding