Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;23:2679–2689. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5191-6

Table 6.

Univariable analysis of influence of waiting time on disease-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Disease-free survival Overall survival
HR 95 % CI p value HR 95 % CI p value
Univariable analysis
 Additional week waiting time 0.97 0.91–1.02 0.222 0.99 0.95–1.05 0.803
 Age at diagnosis 0.98 0.96–1.01 0.129 1.00 0.98–1.02 0.876
 Gender
  Female Reference Reference
  Male 1.27 0.75–2.16 0.379 1.02 0.63–1.66 0.932
 ASA classification
  1 Reference Reference
  2 0.63 0.37–1.09 0.100 0.93 0.54–1.59 0.782
  >3 0.54 0.27–1.07 0.075 0.98 0.53–1.83 0.984
 Tumor location
  Middle esophagus Reference Reference
  Distal esophagus 0.25 0.36–1.30 0.246 0.68 0.37–1.24 0.211
  Gastro-esophageal junction 0.18 0.82–2.89 0.177 1.74 0.96–3.15 0.067
 Surgical approach
  Transthoracic Reference Reference
  Transhiatal 0.50 0.29–0.86 0.012 0.77 0.48–1.24 0.285
 Histological type
  Adenocarcinoma Reference Reference
  Squamous cell carcinoma 0.74 0.43–1.26 0.264 0.93 0.57–1.49 0.748
  Other 3.33 0.45–24.45 0.238 3.37 0.46–24.77 0.233
 pT stage
  T0-2 Reference Reference
  T3-4a 4.08 2.02–8.26 <0.001 2.95 1.62–5.38 <0.001
 pN stage
  N0 Reference Reference
  N1 2.89 1.35–6.20 0.006 2.89 1.52–5.49 0.001
  N2-3 5.20 2.58–10.50 <0.001 3.25 1.78–5.94 <0.001
 Radicality
  R0 Reference Reference
  R1 2.95 1.67–5.21 <0.001 2.65 1.56–4.51 <0.001
 Referral
  By general practitioner Reference Reference
  By another hospital 1.50 0.82–2.75 0.190 1.00 0.60–1.67 0.999
  Additional year date diagnosis 0.88 0.81–0.97 0.009 0.92 0.84–1.01 0.070

Analysis was performed using Cox regression model

ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval