Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;4(2):e21. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5703

Table 2.

PACS users and their responses.

User perspectives of the PACS
No. of items Alphaa Meanb Range
Quality





Encouraging features 15 .906 3.284 1.567-4.033

Non encouraging features 5 .767 3.000 2.50-3.400
Information





Produce better information 4 .888 3.754 3.650-4.000
Images





Quality of images produced 4 .910 4.272 4.183-4.333

Compared to traditional films 4 .855 4.333 4.100-4.483

Confidence in image quality 2 .875 4.205 4.154-4.256

Data adequacy—access to patient data 2 .808 3.558 3.500-3.617
Technical support





Reliable, prompt services 7 .961 3.598 3.483-3.683
Use of the PACS and satisfaction





Frequency of PACS use 5 .638 3.573 2.583-4.000

User satisfaction 3 .887 3.650 3.533-3.717
Future use of the PACS





Expectations, and continuance of use 3 .734 3.394 3.233-3.483
Overall opinion and impact of the PACS





Improved quality and services (benefits) 21 .919 4.008 3.169-4.390

aCronbach Alpha: Measure of Internal Consistency Reliability.

bMean values are based on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest.