Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 24;10(4):876–884. doi: 10.1177/1932296815626724

Table 3.

Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of Dexcom G4 based on Capillary Versus Venous Glucose References When Calibrating CGM by Capillary Values.

Capillary Venous Venous-capillary Point estimate (95% CI) for differencea P value
MARD (%) 11.69 (6.80)
9.81 (0.00; 30.37)
n = 41
13.66 (6.70)
11.66 (5.72; 34.53)
n = 41
1.97 (7.74)
2.41 (–22.47; 21.51)
n = 41
2.03 (0.19; 4.08) .0371
Pearson correlation 0.84 (0.25)
0.93 (–0.20; 1.00)
n = 38
0.85 (0.20)
0.93 (0.07; 1.00)
n = 38
0.01 (0.15)
−0.00 (–0.34; 0.62)
n = 38
−0.00 (–0.03; 0.02) .7489
MARD (%) hypoglycemic range: venous glucose <72 mg/dL (<4 mmol/L) 16.58 (15.38)
11.43 (0.00; 52.94)
n = 13
31.81 (25.96)
25.81 (3.23; 88.73)
n = 13
15.24 (31.52)
14.14 (–49.72; 82.48)
n = 13
14.14 (0.41; 32.99) .0479
MARD (%) euglycemic range: venous glucose 72-180 mg/dL (4-10 mmol/L) 12.09 (7.98)
9.32 (0.00; 40.00)
n = 38
12.56 (6.30)
11.92 (2.44; 26.84)
n = 38
0.47 (9.92)
1.63 (–37.56; 19.49)
n = 38
1.19 (–1.63; 3.99) .3199
MARD (%) hyperglycemic range: venous glucose >180 mg/dL (>10 mmol/L) 8.74 (6.57)
7.37 (0.77; 23.32)
n = 24
9.16 (5.83)
9.07 (0.00; 27.20)
n = 24
0.42 (7.43)
0.60 (–14.23; 15.23)
n = 24
0.43 (–3.06; 3.40) .8247

Data are mean (SD) / median / (min; max) / n. Point estimates and confidence intervals for differences were obtained using Hodges–Lehmann’s procedure. For comparison of accuracy, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used.

a

Venous-capillary.