Table 2.

Psychosocial Determinants of CGM Uptake.

	Sample size	Study design	Results
Ritholz et al25	n = 20 patients with type 1 diabetes n = 14 spouses of the patients	Qualitative analysis	- Less anxiety and more safety for nondiabetic partners because of CGM - Improved understanding of the illness and therapy in spouses, especially in the planning of pregnancies - Conflicts between the partners occur when the patient takes on the sole responsibility or the partner feels frustrated or unable to help
Polonsky and Hessler16	n = 877 patients predominantly with type 1 diabetes (93%)	Qualitative analysis	- 37% of respondents: reported improved interpersonal support
Tansey et al26	Adults: n = 224 Youths: n = 208 Parents: n = 192	RCT Follow-up	- Adults and parents aimed for higher CGM-SAT results than youths - Period of CGM use in daily life depends on the satisfaction when using CGM systems
Ritholz et al18	n = 20 adult patients with type 1 diabetes	Qualitative analysis	- 3 thematic areas differentiate respondents from nonrespondents - Dealing with frustration - Overwhelmed by too much information - Reaction of the social environment