Objective 1: prevalence, exposure and burden |
• What is the expected and observed burden of chronic respiratory diseases and exposure to risk factors, including HAP and tobacco consumption in each of the four countries? |
• Quantitative analysis of existing data |
|
|
|
Objective 1: beliefs and perceptions of respiratory symptoms and their causes |
• What beliefs, perceptions and behaviours are observed about respiratory symptoms and their causes? |
• Participative workshops
• Interviews |
|
|
|
Objective 1: critical factors for implementation |
• What are the critical factors for the successful implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce HAP and tobacco smoke exposure? |
• Systematic review of literature |
|
|
|
Objective 2: action research on awareness raising |
• What are the factors that influence awareness of, and attitude to, risks of HAP and tobacco among healthcare workers and the public?
• How can communities be motivated to change their behaviour to reduce their exposure to smoke from HAP and tobacco? |
• Development and testing of resources using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles25
• Training for healthcare workers
• Household questionnaires
• Patient questionnaires |
|
|
|
Objective 2: reducing exposure to household air pollution |
• What are the local barriers to accessing clean fuel?
• What opportunities exist to improve access to clean fuels and how can these be maximised? |
• Training for healthcare workers
• Before and after awareness questionnaires
• Monitoring 30 households on indoor pollution before and after intervention |
|
|
|
Objective 3: very brief advice training for healthcare workers |
• Who are the best placed healthcare workers to provide very brief advice in contexts where access to health care is limited?
• What are the obstacles and facilitators for these healthcare workers in these contexts to provide very brief advice? |
• Data collection through questionnaires
• Mapping of service provision
• Interviews with healthcare professionals
• Interviews with patients |
|
|
|
Objective 4: improving diagnostics for COPD |
• What is the acceptability and feasibility of using the SpiroSmart smart phone spirometer in low-resource settings?
• How can healthcare workers be supported to administer and interpret spirometry for improved diagnosis? |
• Feasibility study
• Data collection through questionnaires and/or focus groups about user experience
• Pilot training with follow-up
• Interviews with healthcare professionals |
|
|
|
Objective 5: pulmonary rehabilitation feasibility study |
• How can pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes be set up in low-resource settings?
• What are the community’s attitudes to exercise programmes and what socially acceptable and equitable opportunities are there to increase the exercise capacity of people at risk of chronic lung disease?
• Are IT-based home PR methods applicable in remote settings? |
• Feasibility study
• Semi-structured interviews
• Focus groups with practitioners, patients and other key stakeholders |
|
|
|
Objective 6: midwife-led smoke reduction study |
• Is a HAP and tobacco smoke reduction education programme delivered by midwives and village HC teams feasible and acceptable?
• Does it reduce exposure to particulate matter and carbon monoxide?
• Does it improve a range of health outcomes in pregnancy and infancy including respiratory outcomes at the age of 6 months? |
• Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial |
|
|
|
Objective 6: research on terms, concepts and treatment practices for childhood asthma |
• What are the concepts and terms used by carers, healthcare providers and local experts (e.g., traditional healers) for long-term coughing, asthma/wheeze and ARI?
• What are the treatment practices for management of long-term cough and ARI in children aged under 5 years in health centres and by local experts? |
• Qualitative research, including interviews with parents, healthcare professionals and traditional healers |
|
|
|
Objective 6: asthma and acute respiratory infection study |
• What is the feasibility, acceptability and optimal organisation for the roll-out of the findings of a hospital-based intervention using asthma treatment for children presenting with ARI in primary care in rural settings to reduce infant mortality? |
• PDSA cycles
• Observation
• Cost and logistics analysis of supply of medicines
• Qualitative research with healthcare workers and carers |
|
|
|
Objective 7: cost-effectiveness reviews |
• Which interventions are most cost-effective in low-resource settings?
• How many people in the population to be studied have COPD/asthma/the relevant condition?
• How many people could benefit from the intervention?
• What is the cost of providing this intervention for these people? |
• Data analysis using STAR (socio-technical allocation of resources) approach26
• Facilitated workshops for stakeholders using STAR approach |
|
|
|
Objective 7: capacity building in implementation science to key stakeholders |
• What are the local obstacles and facilitators to translating evidence into practice including context, organisation, professional issues and availability of interventions? |
• Participative workshops
• Interviews with stakeholders |