Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2016 Apr 14;28(7):841–855. doi: 10.1037/pas0000297

Table 4.

Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Decentering predicting RT difference scores

Variable Beta Partial
Correlation
Model 1: Hand context
Step 1: R2 = .02, ΔF(2,60) = .47, ƒ2 = .015
 Correctness −.07 −.07
 Depression .10 .10
Step 2: R2 = .02, ΔF(1,59) = .08, ƒ2 = .017
 Correctness −.07 −.07
 Depression .12 .11
 Decentering .04 .04
Model 2: Shoebox context
Step 1: R2 = .08, ΔF(2,60) = 2.65, ƒ2 = .088
 Correctness −.27* −.27
 Depression .07 .07
Step 2: R2 = .12, ΔF(1,59) = 1.72, ƒ2 = .120
 Correctness −.29* −.29
 Depression −.01 −.01
 Decentering −.18 −.17

Note: N = 63. The dependent variable is the difference in RTs between negative and neutral trials calculated and entered separately for the hand and shoebox contexts; higher scores indicated a greater effect of stimulus valence on RTs. “Correctness” is the difference in correctness between negative and neutral trials, calculated and entered separately for hand and shoebox contexts; higher scores indicated a greater effect of stimulus valence on correctness. Depression was assessed using the QIDS-SR16. Decentering was assessed using the EQ.

*

p < .05.