Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 30;4:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.04.009

Table 2.

Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses regarding step one: self-formulated first reaction in response to the HRA invitation, for postal and telephone participants (n = 892), coded according to I-change model constructs.

I-change construct HRA completers, %n with this reaction n = 696 HRA non-completers, %n with this reaction n = 196 OR (95% CI) of completing the HRA Main exemplification
Not answered 10.3 23.5 1.00
Information factors; positive 13.2 8.2 1.89 (1.08–3.32) ‘Initiative GP/researcher/other’
Information factors; negative 4.6 1.0 6.44 (1.49–27.90) ‘Cannot remember/have not received invitation’
Awareness factors; positive 12.9 10.2 1.39 (0.83–2.35) ‘Obtain insight into risks’, ‘importance prevention’, ‘health/healthy aging’
Awareness factors; negative 3.0 3.6 1.06 (0.44–2.58) ‘More useful for others’
Motivation factors; positive/rational attitude 57.8 55.1 1.53 (1.06–2.20) ‘Good’, ‘positive’, ‘important’
Motivation factors; negative/emotional attitude 2.9 4.6 0.88 (0.38–2.06) ‘Unnecessary’
Motivation factors; positive social influences 1.1 0 NA ‘Action linkage: help from others’
Intention state; precontemplation 1.7 3.6 0.69 (0.26–1.88) ‘Not wanting to participate’
Intention state; contemplation 14.4 8.2 2.30 (1.29–4.08)⁎⁎ ‘Wanting to participate’
Barriers 4.2 0.5 13.88 (1.85–104.21) ‘No time’
Ability factors 3.7 3.1 2.10 (0.82–5.40)⁎⁎⁎ ‘Having no barriers’
Other 4.3 2.6 2.33 (0.87–6.26) Not specified

CI = confidence interval, NA = not applicable.

p < .05.

⁎⁎

p < .01.

⁎⁎⁎

p < .001.