Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 30;4:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.04.009

Table 3.

Descriptive and univariable logistic regression analyses of step two: structured set of predefined determinants of HRA completion, for postal and telephone participants (n = 892).a

HRA completers, %n agreement with factor, n = 696 HRA non-completers, %n agreement with factor, n = 196 OR (95% CI) of completing the HRA Corresponding questiona
Information factors; guidance 74.6 70.1 1.25 (0.88–1.78) ‘Do you trust you will get the guidance you need if you have an increased risk?’
Awareness factors; prior experience 25.2 28.4 0.85 (0.59–1.21) ‘Have you ever done a health check for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or kidney disease before?’
Awareness factors; health complaints 52.7 60.2 0.74 (0.53–1.02) ‘Do you have one or more health complaints at the moment?’
Awareness factors; perceived risk 54.6 59.6 0.82 (0.59–1.13) ‘Do you think the chance of getting these diseases is average to high?
Awareness factors; knowing risk 91.2 85.6 1.73 (1.07–2.80) ‘Do you want to know what your chance of these diseases is?’
Motivation factors; fear test result 23.4 28.5 0.77 (0.54–1.10) ‘Are you afraid of the test result?’
Motivation factors; fear adjusting lifestyle 25.9 32.0 0.74 (0.53–1.05)⁎⁎ ‘Are you afraid that you have to adjust your lifestyle habits?’
Motivation factors; locus of control 59.2 46.2 1.69 (1.23–2.33)⁎⁎⁎ ‘Do you think you can control staying healthy?’
Motivation factors; social influences 67.7 59.9 1.40 (1.00–1.96) ‘Do others find it important for you to participate?’

CI = confidence interval, NA = not applicable.

a

Occasional slight adjustments in formulation so all questions are answered with yes/no.

p < .05.

⁎⁎

p < .01.

⁎⁎⁎

p < .001.