Skip to main content
. 2016 May 5;594(13):3745–3774. doi: 10.1113/JP272231

Table 1.

Comparison of physiological properties of PV+ and CCK+ interneurons

P (Mann–
Parameters PV+ CCK+ Whitney)
Input resistance (Mohm) 55.64 (40.04, 67.32) 107.89 (51.80, 151.44) 0.001**
Membrane time constant (ms) 8.80 (6.0, 11.0) 11.40 (9.05, 15.85) 0.002**
Relative amplitude of hyperpolarizing sag 1.28 (1.16, 1.48) 1.24 (1.14, 1.50) NS
Relative amplitude of rebound response following hyperpolarization 1.43 (1.28, 1.58) 1.28 (1.17, 1.70) NS
Relative amplitude of early overshoot for depolarizing steps 1.15 (1.09, 1.29) 1.19 (1.09, 1.39) NS
Rheobase current (pA) 125.0 (60.0, 162.0) 150.0 (90.0, 200.0) NS
Maximal action potential number for any input current 145.50 (105.0, 162.0) 58.0 (47.75, 74.25) 1.5 × 10−7 ***
Voltage threshold (mV) −43.11 (−48.68, −39.48) −42.81 (−45.17, −41.45) NS
Action potential amplitude (mV) 62.92 (48.58, 71.48) 74.27 (67.64, 79.80) 0.1 × 10−3 ***
Action potential rise time (ms) 0.0005 (0.0004, 0.0005) 0.0005 (0.0005, 0.0006) 0.003***
Action potential half‐width (ms) 0.32 (0.26, 0.37) 0.50 (0.38, 0.60) 1.4 × 10−6 ***
Action potential width (ms) 1.32 (1.16, 1.39) 1.73 (1.44, 2.09) 3.9 × 10−6 ***
Voltage difference between start and end of action potential (mV) 12.46 (9.54, 14.80) 11.16 (8.57, 13.56) NS
Maximal steepness of rising phase of action potential (mV ms−1) 246.2 (181.1, 330.0) 278.8 (230.0, 312.5) NS
Voltage for maximal (positive) steepness of action potentials (mV) −11.54 (−18.29, −3.12) −3.66 (−12.61, 3.40) 0.007**
Maximal (negative) steepness of falling phase of APs (mV ms−1) −203.2 (−231.4, −178.9) −135.5 (−188.9, −118.7) 0.1 × 10−3 ***
Voltage for maximal negative steepness of APs (mV) −7.61 (−18.01, 0.72) 5.53 (−7.52, 16.29) 0.9 × 10−3 ***
Amplitude of after‐hyperpolarization (mV) (old method) −0.05 (−0.54, 0.21) 0.45 (−0.02, 1.24) 0.01*
Duration of after‐hyperpolarization (ms) (old method) 0.30 (0.22, 0.39) 0.41 (0.27, 4.83) NS
Amplitude of after‐hyperpolarization (mV) (new method) 12.46 (9.93, 15.01) 12.68 (9.64, 14.55) NS
Duration of after‐hyperpolarization (ms) (new method) 1.59 (1.33, 1.80) 2.38 (1.77, 6.94) 0.003**
Latency of first action potential (ms) 118.80 (36.40, 429.60) 56.80 (33.10, 95.20) 0.03*
Action potential number in ‘steady’ trace* 23.0 (12.0, 34,0) 15.0 (11.0, 21.0) 0.01*
Average interspike interval (ms) in ‘steady’ trace* 33.25 (22.48, 51.76) 51.94 (38.20, 70.12) 0.002**
Action potential half‐width (ms) in ‘steady’ trace* 0.34 (0.29, 0.37) 0.57 (0.46, 0.71) 3.86 × 10−7 ***
Action potential amplitude (mV) in ‘steady’ trace* 57.92 (52.51, 68.47) 71.20 (66.31, 75.39) 5.77 × 10−5 ***
Voltage threshold (mV) in ‘steady’ trace* −42.04 (−44.05, −39.58) −40.99 (−43.76, −39.65) NS
Difference in threshold (mV) in ‘steady’ trace* 24.81 (18.86, 26.54) 27.03 (24.51, 32.25) 0.2 × 10−4 ***
Action potential width (ms) in ‘steady’ trace* 1.32 (1.19, 1.40) 1.99 (1.66, 2.36) 9.66 × 10−7 ***
Voltage difference between start and end of AP (mV) in ‘steady’ trace* 13.74 (10.19, 15.90) 10.22 (8.22, 13.48) 0.006**
Amplitude of after‐hyperpolarization (mV) (old method, ‘steady’ trace*) −0.08 (−0.28, 0.16) 1.53 (−0.01, 2.88) 6.59 × 10−5 ***
Duration of after‐hyperpolarization (ms) (old method, ‘steady’ trace*) 0.26 (0.23, 0.33) 5.64 (0.33, 9.02) 0.1 × 10−3 ***
Spike frequency accommodation 1.50 (0.60, 2.75) 2.92 (1.76, 7.39) 9.75 × 10−5 ***
Change in inter‐spike intervals between start and end of step (ms) 16.39 (3.31, 34.38) 54.44 (29.66, 107.49) 3.37 × 10−5 ***
Steepness of interspike interval change vs. AP number relation (ms) 0.36 (−0.05, 1.26) 2.61 (1.06, 7.34) 9.47 × 10−6 ***
Change in action potential half‐width during step (ms) 0.01 (−0.003, 0.3) 0.13 (0.06, 0.18) 5.81 × 10−6 ***
Steepness of AP half‐width change vs. AP number relation (ms) 0.0004 (−0.0002, 0.001) 0.006 (0.002, 0.012) 4.55 × 10−7 ***
Change in action potential amplitude during step (mV) 1.56 (−4.79, 3.48) −2.68 (−6.38, 4.24) NS
Steepness of AP amplitude change vs. AP number relation (mV) 0.04 (−0.10, 0.14) −0.15 (−0.37, 0.19) NS
Measure of cell excitability 0.52 (0.23, 0.70) 0.29 (0.19, 0.57) NS

Median values and interquartile ranges for PV+ and CCK+ cells are listed for each physiological feature. The last column shows the P values for comparisons between the medians according to a Mann–Whitney U test where P < 0.05 (NS, non‐significant otherwise); it also marks the level of significance with stars (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). The ‘steady’ trace was the response to the smallest current step which evoked at least six action potentials.