Table 4.
Best‐fitting parameters describing the short‐term plasticity of different types of connection
| Connection type | U 0 | τr (ms) | τe (ms) | a e | (1/s) | I max (pA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PV+BC–PV+BC | 0.31 (0.25, 0.34) | 1080 | 23.7 | 0.64 | 13.2 | 410 (270, 710) |
| PV+BC–PC | 0.33 (0.22, 0.42) | 1620 | 13.5 | 0.72 | 22.6 | 289 (253, 333) |
| AAC–PC | 0.26 (0.22, 0.30) | 1700 | 13.6 | 0.98 | 24.7 | 646 (321, 828) |
| Connection type | U 0 | τr (ms) | τf (ms) | I max (pA) | ||
| CCK+BC–PC | 0.15 (0.11, 0.18) | 71 | 10.9 (7.2, 53.5) | 499 (252, 708) |
The first three types of connection were best described by a model that included the use‐dependent replenishment of resources but lacked facilitation: eqns (1), (3), (4) and (5). CCK+BC–PC connections were best described by a model that included short‐term facilitation but not use‐dependent replenishment: eqns (1), (2) and (5). Medians and interquartile ranges for each connection type are shown in the case of parameters for which connection‐specific values were fit; the single best‐fitting value is shown for connection type‐specific parameters for which the value was fit jointly for all connections within the given type.