Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2015 Jun 5;116(12):1887–1906. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304521

Table 2.

The Prevalence of Early Repolarization ECGs and Their Prognosis in the Population Studies

Coutry Authors Year
Published
Position
of
ERP
Individuals
Screened, n
Male
Sex
Mean Age
at
Baseline, y
J point elevation
Mean
Follow-up
Period, y
RR of Death According to
the ERP
≥ 0.1 mV
, n (%)
≥ 0.2 mV
, n (%)
Cardiac Sudden or
Arrhythymic
Europe
 Finland Tikkanen et al256 2009 Inf or Lat 10864 52% 44 ± 8 630 (5.8) 67 (0.6) 30 ± 11 1.28* in Inf
1.34* in Lat
1.43* in Inf
0.75 in Lat
 Germany Sinner et al257 2010 Inf or Lat 6213 49% 52 ± 10 812 (13.1) not described 19 3.44* not described
 France Rollin et al 2012 Inf or Lat 1161 52% 50 ± 9 159 (13.7) 74 (6.4) 14 ± 2 5.28* in Inf
6.27* in Lat
not described
North America
 USA Klatsky et al253 2003 All 73088 44% 37 ± 13 670 (0.9) 494 (0.7) 14 0.8 not described
 USA Uberoi et al 2011 Inf or Lat 29281 87% 55 ± 15 664 (2.3) 0 8 ± 4 1.73 in Inf
0.83 in Lat
not described
 USA Olson258 2011 All 15141 44% 54 ± 6 1866 (12.3) not described 17 ± 4 not described 1.23 in all
2.03* in whites
 USA Ilkhanoff et al259 2014 All 5039 46% 25 1249 (20.9) not described 23 0.96 not described
Asia
 Japan Haruta et al260 2011 Inf or Lat 5976 44% not described 1429 (23.9) not described 24 ± 15 0.75* 1.83*
 Japan Hisamatsu et al261 2013 All§ 7630 41% 52 264 (3.5) not described 15 2.54* not described

Ant indicates anterior leads; ECG, electrocardiogram; ERP, early repolarization pattern; Inf, inferior leads; Lat, lateral leads; RR, relative risk; and USA, United States of America.

*

Statistically significant

For the cardiovascular death

At baseline

§

≥ 0.2 mV in anterior leads