Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 30;11:30. doi: 10.1186/s13020-016-0102-0

Table 4.

The lipid profile in plasma of placebo and SWT treated healthy subjects

Group TG (mg/dL) p value* TC (mg/dL) p value* HDL-c (mg/dL) p value* LDL-c (mg/dL) p value*
Baseline
 Placebo 100.22 ± 25.60a 0.81 192.85 ± 38.05a 0.95 57.02 ± 11.21a 0.87 114.98 ± 32.99a 0.69
 SWT 102.12 ± 28.60a 192.05 ± 35.34a 57.52 ± 10.25b 113.05 ± 31.23a
3rd month
 Placebo 97.56 ± 14.96a 0.01 191.71 ± 34.63a 0.62 58.60 ± 12.88a 0.45 113.60 ± 34.04a 0.83
 SWT 87.27 ± 14.64b 192.20 ± 35.55a 59.20 ± 13.41a 113.13 ± 32.32a
6th month
 Placebo 97.64 ± 23.39a 0.01 192.36 ± 32.85a 0.88 57.51 ± 12.75a 0.23 113.84 ± 32.21a 0.48
 SWT 85.89 ± 17.86b 192.73 ± 36.25a 59.13 ± 12.31a 112.84 ± 33.68a

Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 55). Data within the same column of each group bearing different superscript letters were significantly different (p < 0.05)

* Student’s t test was used to assess statistical significance between placebo and Si Wu Tang (SWT)