Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 1;17:480. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2831-y

Table 2.

Norovirus reads and coverage per sample

Sample Reads mapping to NoV Percentage of NoV reads Average coverage % of positions calleda Length of consensus sequence (bp)
Vs. non-rRNA reads Vs. quality filtered reads
OU1 37863 4.01 % 0.51 % 590X 100 % 7532
OU2 88270 5.36 % 1.88 % 1318X 99.55 % 7525
OU3 746 0.04 % 0.01 % 11X 90.59 % N.A.b
OU4 1420 2.43 % 0.02 % 22X N.A. 7657
SP1 102805 8.54 % 1.78 % 1603X 99.91 % 7524
SP2 9589 7.55 % 0.33 % 149X 99.91 % 7535

N.A.: not applicable

aCoverage was calculated compared to KF509946 (OU1), KC631827 (OU2), KJ196277 (OU3), JN899243.1 (OU4) and KC576909 (SP1 and SP2)

bThe alignment of OU3 produced 9 non overlapping contigs of 1744, 281, 518, 394, 434, 106, 119, 487 and 2760 nt long