Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 19;24(5):739–747. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.167

Table 3. Associations between dichotomous pigmentation traits for stage 1.

Pigmentation trait p (padj) p (padj)a OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)a
Eye colour (blue)
 Hair colour (blond) <1.0 × 10−5 (3.0 × 10−5) 0.0047 (0.014) 3.6 (2.1–6.2) 2.7 (1.3–5.5)
         
Hair colour (red tint)
 Skin type (fair, I–II) <1.0 × 10−5 (3.0 × 10−5) 3.0 × 10−4 (9.0 × 10−4) 4.1 (2.4–7.2) 3.1 (1.7–5.6)
         
Hair colour (blond)b
 Eye colour (blue) 1.0 × 10−5 (3.0 × 10−5) <1.0 × 10−5 (3.0 × 10−5)c 3.6 (2.1–6.3) 4.4 (2.5–7.8)c
         
Skin type (fair, I–II)
 Hair colour (red) <1.0 × 10−5 (3.0 × 10−5) <1.0 × 10−5 (3.0 × 10−5)d 5.7 (3.1–10.2) 5.7 (3.1–10.2)d
 Hair colour (blond) 2.7 × 10−4 (8.1 × 10−4) 2.7 × 10−4 (8.1 × 10−4)d 2.9 (1.6–5.2) 2.9 (1.6–5.2)d

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

padj: Bonferroni-adjusted P-value (three tests). All associations were evaluated in a multiple logistic regression analysis treating the remaining three traits as influential variables, and by backward selection.

a

P-values and ORs are from a multiple logistic regression analysis including the predictive SNPs from Table 2 as influential variables.

b

In the analysis of the light-dark component of hair colour, two individuals with pure red hair colour were removed.

c

Multiple logistic regression analysis including the predictive SNPs of Table 2 eventually disregarded rs12913832 (HERC2) after backward selection.

d

Multiple logistic regression analysis eventually disregarded all predictive SNPs from Table 2 after backward selection.