Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 9;5(7):403–415. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.30

Table 4. Key Observations About the Regulation of Quality and Availability of TB Medicinesa .

India Tanzania Zambia
Regulatory framework
• No comprehensive policy framework for regulation of TB medicines (-)
• Manufacture and import of TB medicines not specifically restricted
• Drugs and Cosmetics Act and MoHFW guidelines outlined measures to assure quality of procured medicines (+)
• Policy of MoHSW restricted imports to government operators only (++)b • Import of TB medicines not specifically restricted
• PRA and MoH guidelines outlined measures to assure quality of procured medicines (+)
• Production + procurement
• Drugs and Cosmetics Act (universal) and MoHFW guidelines (government sector only) outlined measures to assure norms and standards during stocking and distribution (+) • MSD and MoHFW guidelines outlined measures to assure norms and standards during stocking and distribution (+) • PRA and MoH guidelines outlined measures to assure norms and standards during stocking and distribution (+) • Stocking + distribution
• MoHFW mandated DOTS regimens in all government facilities and in government-affiliated private facilities (+)
• National drug schedules required that TB medicines be dispensed only on prescription (+)
• Policy of MoHSW stated that only facilities affiliated to the NTLP were allowed to prescribe and dispense TB medicines, in accordance with DOTS (++)b • MoH mandated DOTS regimens in all government facilities and in government-affiliated private facilities (+)
• PRA norms required that TB medicines be dispensed only on prescription by qualified medical practitioners (+)
• Prescribing + dispensing
Authority and capacity
• Drug controllers faced severe human resource constraints (--)b
• Concerns over technical capacity of central and state regulatory authorities (-)
• Amendments in laws were in process to increase criminal penalties for defaulters (+)
• PQ requirement not universal (at time of study) (-)
• Policy widely supported across constituencies (++)b
• Political support for regulatory body (++)b
• Drug controllers faced financial and human resource constraints (-) • Production + procurement
• Drug controllers faced severe human resource constraints (--)b
• Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+)
• Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+) • Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+) • Stocking + distribution
• Drug controllers faced severe human resource constraints to controlling dispensing practices, had no authority over prescribing practices (-)
• Government recommendations for drug regimens not applicable in private sector (--)b
• Professional councils were uninvolved in matters of regulating practices (-)
• Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+)
• Professional councils were uninvolved in matters of regulating practices (-)
• Drug controllers faced financial and human resource constraints (-)
• Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+)
• Professional councils were uninvolved in matters of regulating practices (-)
• Prescribing + dispensing
Implementation
• Some concerns over implementation of quality control. Few instances of penal action (-) • Faithful implementation of import restrictions (++)b • No specific observations of barriers or enablers • Production + procurement
• Drug controllers unable to monitor private distribution (--)b
• Inspections and prosecutions infrequent, in private sector (-)
• Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+)
• Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme (+) • Clear lines of authority and perception of fair monitoring capacity in the government TB programme
• Drug controllers ability to monitor private distribution questionable (-)
• Stocking + distribution
• Fair adherence to dispensing, prescribing norms in government facilities (+)
• Reports of widespread violation of dispensing, prescribing norms in private facilities (-)b
• Inspections and prosecutions of private sector defaulters infrequent (-)
• Fair adherence to dispensing, prescribing norms in government and affiliated facilities (+)
• Some reports of abuse of prescription-drug norm in private facilities (-)
• Inspections and prosecutions of private sector defaulters infrequent (-)
• Fair adherence to dispensing, prescribing norms in government and affiliated facilities (+)
• Several reports of abuse of prescription-drug norm in private facilities (--)b
• Inspections and prosecutions of private sector defaulters infrequent (-)
• Prescribing + dispensing
Efficiency, transparency, and accountability
• Perceived inefficiencies in coordinating state and central authorities’ roles (-)
• Private representation and political involvement in regulatory affairs widely recognized (--)b
• Perceived improved efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme, and exclusion of private actors
• Perception that efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme, likely to be attenuated by moves to integrate disease programmes (-)
• Perceived improved efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme
• Risk of donor dependence in drug procurement (-)
• Production + procurement
• Drug controllers prioritized drug quality management over regulating distributors and practitioners (-)
• Limited information about distribution networks among informal/small private sector catering to poor (-)
• Perception that efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme, likely to be attenuated by moves to integrate disease programmes (-) • Perceived improved efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme • Stocking + distribution
• Professional councils rejected role in regulating dispensing and prescribing practices (-)
• Drug controllers prioritized drug quality management over regulating distributors and practitioners (-)
• Some professional associations opposed government regimens (--)b
• Perceived improved efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme
• Private actors perceived lack of inclusiveness of policy-making by TB programme (-)
• Little information about practices of informal/small private healthcare providers (--)b
• Perceived improved efficiency resulting from hierarchical control of TB programme
• Little information about practices of informal/small private healthcare providers (--)b
• Prescribing + dispensing

Abbreviations: MoHFW, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; TB, tuberculosis; NTLP, National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme; PQ, Prequalification; PRA, Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency; MoH, Ministry of Health; DOTS, directly observed therapy short-course; MSD, Medical Stores Department.

a Constraining and enabling factors are tagged with (-) and (+) signs, respectively.

b Most frequent and salient observation.