Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Jun 1;40(7):1567–1576. doi: 10.1111/acer.13110

Table 2.

Summary of results and Cohen’s d effect sizes.

Task Outcome Manipulation Check* GLM Results
Main Effects Interactions


Med Bev Time Med x Time Bev x Time M x B x T
Subjective Reactivity Craving Subjective F=6.24, p=.02 F=5.15, p=.03c,d
Intoxication F=15.27, p<.01 F=3.38, p=.04b

Cognitive Function CPT Omissions F=3.51, p=.08 F=4.64, p=.04c F=2.94, p=.07b
Commissions F=5.51, p=.03 F=4.74, p=.02c
DSST Attempts F=3.40, p=.04b,d
Successes F=3.14, p=.06b,d
N-back 1 Correct F=4.34, p=.06 F=3.29, p=.05b
Total Time F=7.46, p=.02 F=3.33, p=.05c,d

Perceptual Motor Function Pursuit Rotor Average % on Target F=10.07, p<.01 F=2.50, p=.1b,d

Physiologic Reactivity Systolic BP F=3.62, p=.08 F=5.77, p=.02c
Diastolic BP F=5.48, p=.03 F=4.26, p=.02c,d
Heart Rate F=19.82, p<.01 F=3.36, p=.05b F=16, p<.01c F=2.64, p=.08b

Note: Blank cells are n.s.

No significant medication by beverage interactions.

*

Manipulation Check for main effect of beverage or beverage by time in placebo only subjects. Cohen d Effect size:

a

Small (0.1 – 0.3),

b

medium (0.4 – 0.6),

c

large (0.7 - >0.9)

d

Controlled for baseline (−45 timepoint; for outcomes with baseline differences only).