Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 28;4(4):636–644. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.326

Table 4.

Thermal properties of composite cassava‐maize‐wheat bread stored for 4 days as affected by hydrocolloids, emulsifiers, and a combination of both improvers

Composite bread samples To (°C) Tp (°C) ∆Hretro (J/g dry crumb)
No emulsifier or hydrocolloid 51.1 ± 0.4 52.1 ± 0.8 20.0 ± 0.2g
Emulsifiers (0.3%):
DATEM 51.2 ± 1.2 54.7 ± 1.4 14.0 ± 0.2def
LC 51.9 ± 1.0 54.7 ± 2.1 23.2 ± 0.4h
MG 52.1 ± 0.6 52.9 ± 0.6 15.6 ± 0.8f
Hydrocolloids (3%):
CMC 51.5 ± 2.2 54.8 ± 0.6 12.8 ± 0.5cd
HM pectin 51.6 ± 0.3 56.4 ± 1.6 14.8 ± 0.8ef
Hydrocolloids (3%) + emulsifiers (0.3%):
CMC/DATEM 50.6 ± 0.7 55.2 ± 1.5 10.6 ± 0.3b
HM pectin/DATEM 52.8 ± 0.5 55.6 ± 1.1 10.3 ± 0.1b
CMC/LC 52.8 ± 1.4 55.2 ± 2.6 6.7 ± 0.4a
HM pectin/LC 52.9 ± 2.0 55.6 ± 1.3 12.8 ± 0.6cde
CMC/MG 50.8 ± 0.7 55.1 ± 0.5 11.1 ± 0.9bc
HM pectin/MG 53.4 ± 1.5 56.9 ± 1.4 15.8 ± 0.6f

Values in the fourth column followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

To, onset temperature; Tp, peak temperature; ∆Hretro, enthalpy of melting of the amylopectin recrystallization; CMC, carboxymethyl cellulose; HM pectin, high methoxyl pectin; DATEM, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides; LC, lecithin; MG, monoglycerides.