Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Decis Making. 2016 Mar 16;36(6):703–713. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16638321

Table 3.

Best fitting linear model for communication intentions after receiving prognostic information (N = 89).

Predictor Model 1 Model 2
Ambiguity Aversion 0.08+
(−0.15, −0.02)
0.06+
(−0.14, −0.01)
Credibility of prognostic models 0.49**
(0.07, 0.91)
0.54*
(0.97, 1.00)
Subjective numeracy 0.19**
(0.06, 0.32)
0.18*
(0.03, 0.34)
Objective numeracy 0.03
(−0.31, 0.37)
0.05
(−0.34, 0.45)
Gender (1=male, 2=female) 0.29
(−0.27, 0.86)
Age 0.24
(−0.71, 0.23)
Years since residency 0.02
(−0.04, 0.07)
Proportion of time spent in clinical 0.001
(−0.01, 0.01)

Unstandardized regression coefficients (95% CI);

+

<.10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01.