Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;33(7):929–938. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0716-2

Table 2.

Characteristics of oocytes donated for TEM

Oocyte fixed at Numbers of Donor age (year) Numbers of stimulation cycles with Causes of infertility
Patients Cycles Oocytes Agonist Antagonist Endometriosis Myoma Oviduct PCO Thyroid dysfunction Uterus Unknown
GVa 10 10 14 36.2 ± 2.4 10 4 0 0 7 0 1 0 6
GVBDb 15 15 21 37.9 ± 3 14 7 1 0 4 0 2 1 14
GVc 3 3 3 35.6 ± 3.2 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
GVBDd 3 3 3 38.2 ± 3.2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
MIIe 3 3 3 36 ± 5.3 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
GVBDf 9 9 15 37.2 ± 3 11 4 0 0 3 0 2 0 11
Matureg 6 6 6 40 ± 1.4 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 3
Colchicine -treated GVh 2 2 5i 32.8 ± 0.3 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
Cytochalasin B -treated GVBDj 3 3 3i 44.5 ± 2.7 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

a, bAnalysis of mitochondrial localization by TEM in Fig. 3

c–eAnalysis of are ratio of mitochondria by TEM in Fig. 4

a, f, g, h, jAnalysis of mitochondrial clustering by TEM in Fig. 6

iOocytes were fixed after live imaging. Donor age was shown mean ± SD