Table 4.
Estimate effects of herbal medicines for metabolic syndrome: differences of values before and after treatment.
| Intervention | Study ID | WC | BMI | FPG | 2 hPG | TG | HDL-C | SBP | DBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dia-No | Agrawal et al., 2008 [13] | +0.02 | −0.18∗ | −41.15∗ | NR | −10.59∗ | +1.12 | −2.29∗ | −1.23∗ |
| Yiqi Huaju Recipe | Chen et al., 2014 [14] | −4.68∗ | −1.51∗ | −7.02# | −29.34∗ | −7.12 | +1.93 | −11.32∗ | −6.5∗ |
| Daotan decoction | Zhang et al., 2014 [15] | −2.98∗ | −0.49∗ | −2.52 | NR | −28.48∗ | +2.32∗ | −7.43∗ | −2.28∗ |
| Gegen Shanzha decoction | Xu et al., 2014 [16] | −5.31∗ | −2.69∗ | −21.42∗ | NR | −99.68∗ | +18.91∗ | −19.66∗ | −10.5∗ |
| Xuefu Zhuyu decoction | Li, 2014 [17] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Qinggan Jiangtang tablet | Wang et al., 2005 [18] | NR | NR | −28.8# | −52.2# | −12.46∗ | +2.70 | −7.5∗ | −2.9∗ |
| Modified Banxia Baizhu Tianma decoction | Liu et al., 2008 [19] | −0.91 | −0.74# | −7.02# | −19.08# | −23.14∗ | +7.72∗ | −4.38∗ | −3.23∗ |
| Pinggan Jiangya pill | Zhang et al., 2010 [20] | −7.81∗ | −2.95∗ | NR | NR | NR | NR | −28.00∗ | −14.33∗ |
| Huanglian Wendan decoction | Guan et al., 2012 [21] | NR | −1.95# | −27.54# | NR | −62.3∗ | +11.19∗ | −10.73∗ | −8.24∗ |
| Xueguan Ruanhua decoction | Dong, 2012 [22] | NR | NR | −6.12 | NR | −30.26∗ | +15.83∗ | −8.75∗ | −9.33∗ |
| Shengjiangtongmai powder | Cui and Wie, 2014 [23] | NR | −2.52 | −82.08∗ | NR | −89.89∗ | NR | 30∗ | 15∗ |
| Shenling Jianpihuashi decoction | Danyang Zhao and Danun Zhao, 2015 [24] | −7.2∗ | −2.7# | −16.2# | −34.2# | −71.2∗ | +3.86 | −11.6# | −9.3# |
∗Significant difference between intervention and control group (P < 0.05).
#Significant difference before and after treatment (P < 0.05).
WC: waist circumference; BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; 2 hPG: 2-hour postprandial glucose; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.