Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2016 May 20;161:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.026

Table 3.

Multivariable Adjusted Association of Each Disaster Damage with Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) among the Survivors from the Disaster (N=3,464) in Japan

Characteristics Coefficient SE 95%CI p-value
Loss of family and friends
    No loss reference
    Loss of family members 0.23 0.11 0.02 , 0.44 0.035
    Loss of friends 0.04 0.14 −0.24 , 0.32 0.78
    Both −0.04 0.21 −0.46 , 0.38 0.84
Loss of pet(s)
    Had no pets 0.08 0.11 −0.13 , 0.29 0.46
    No pet loss reference
    Lost dog(s) 0.23 0.33 −0.41 , 0.87 0.48
    Lost cat(s) 1.05 0.37 0.32 , 1.77 0.0047
    Lost other pets −0.18 0.63 −1.41 , 1.06 0.78
    Lost dog(s) & cat(s) −0.23 0.91 −2.02 , 1.55 0.80
    Lost cat(s) & other pets 0.24 1.81 −3.31 , 3.80 0.89
    Lost dog(s) & other pets 1.07 2.59 −4.00 , 6.15 0.68
House damage
    Entirely destroyed 1.40 0.22 0.96 , 1.83 <.0001
    Largely destroyed 0.54 0.24 0.077 , 1.01 0.023
    Half destroyed 0.53 0.18 0.18 , 0.88 0.0031
    Partly destroyed 0.20 0.10 0.016 , 0.39 0.034
    No damage reference
Car damage
    Lost cars 0.47 0.14 0.21 , 0.74 0.0005
    Did not have cars at that time 0.31 0.14 0.029 , 0.60 0.031
    No damage of cars reference
Job loss
    Lost jobs, but have restarted the same job 0.90 0.37 0.18 , 1.63 0.014
    Have lost jobs 1.14 0.24 0.66 , 1.62 <.0001
    Have not been working 0.42 0.12 0.19 , 0.65 0.0003
    Have been working reference
    Have started a new job after the disaster 0.65 0.50 −0.33 , 1.62 0.19
Disruption of access to psychiatry 2.51 0.63 1.28 , 3.74 <.0001

Note. GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale. CI: confidence interval. SE: standard error.

a. Age (continuous), sex, marital status, education, income, self-rated health, body mass index, smoking status, drinking status, having past/present psychiatric diseases, having any chronic diseases or conditions, frequency of informal socializing, and GDS score in 2010 were adjusted in the model.

b. Other types of disaster damage were not simultaneously included in the same model.