Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;7(4):415–421. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12345

Table 1.

Relationship between RelB expression and clinicopathological characteristics

Characteristics RelB expression P value
High Low
N = 60 (52%) N = 55 (48%)
Gender 0.731
Male 27 (54.0) 23 (46.0)
Female 33 (50.8) 32 (49.2)
Age 0.596
Mean ± SD 60.04 ± 10.25 60.19 ± 10.34
Range 34–83 39–87
Smoking 0.733
Yes 20 (50.0) 20 (50.0)
No 40 (53.3) 35 (46.7)
Histology 0.899
ADC 43 (51.8) 40 (48.2)
SCC 17 (53.1) 15 (46.9)
Degree of differentiation 0.023*
Low 23 (67.6) 11 (32.4)
Middle 34 (47.2) 38 (52.8)
High 3 (33.3) 6 (66.7)
Depth of tumor invasion <0.001*
T1 10 (29.4) 24 (70.6)
T2 28 (53.9) 24 (46.1)
T3 13 (72.2) 5 (27.8)
T4 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2)
Lymph node metastasis 0.017*
N0 20 (41.7) 28 (58.3)
N1 30 (54.5) 25 (45.6)
N2 10 (83.3) 2 (16.7)
Distant metastases 0.004*
No 47 (47.0) 53 (53.0)
Yes 13 (86.7) 2 (13.3)
TNM stage <0.001*
I 9 (27.3) 24 (72.7)
II 17 (41.5) 24 (58.5)
III 21 (80.8) 5 (19.2)
IV 13 (86.7) 2 (13.3)
*

The difference had statistical significance. ADC, adenocarcinoma; NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; SD, standard deviation; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TNM, tumor node metastasis.