Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;7:12025. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12025

Table 1. Dissimilarity in feeding trait composition.

Functional feeding groups Contribution
Mean density
  BF→FA FA→FR BF FA FR
A. Manipulated stream
 Herbivores 57.82 28.08 647 (231) 4,325 (2,022) 1,878 (348)
 Collector–gatherers 6.26 4.0 43 (25) 447 (322) 169 (83)
 Predators 5.71 4.25 60 (43) 451 (357) 244 (246)
 Collector–filterers 0.83 0.58 60 (42) 51 (47) 31 (29)
 Shredders 0.72 0.49 4 (5) 46 (47) 23 (13)
 Overall dissimilarity 71.35 37.4      
           
B. Reference stream
 Shredders 15.73 14.07 4,969 (245) 7,943 (2,875) 9,847 (1,803)
 Herbivores 2.44 2.23 1,203 (235) 1,513 (451) 1830 (245)
 Collector–gatherers 1.12 2.73 403 (75) 231 (117) 815 (618)
 Predators 0.92 1.01 244 (98) 321 (152) 110 (74)
 Collector–filterers 0.67 0.59 111 (23) 150 (220) 87 (71)
 Overall dissimilarity 20.88 20.6      

Relative contribution (%) of the five functional feeding groups to the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (SIMPER analysis) and overall dissimilarity (%) between base flow and flow alteration stages (BF→FA), and flow alteration and flow recovery stages (FA→FR) in the manipulated (A) and reference (B) reach. Mean density (ind m−2) and s.d. of the five functional feeding groups for base flow (BF), flow alteration stages (FA), and flow recovery stages (FR) in the manipulated (A) and reference (B) reach.