Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;7(4):522–528. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12439

Table 1.

General characteristics of the participants in the cross‐sectional study

NGT IFG T2DM P‐value
n 2,139 148 66
Age (years) 37 ± 11 44 ± 12 46 ± 11 <0.001**
BMI (kg/m2) 23.02 ± 3.19 24.28 ± 3.63 24.24 ± 3.61 <0.001**
Osteocalcin (ng/mL) 23.6 (19.24–29.23) 20.70 (17.08–24.97) 18.58 (15.75–22.59) <0.001**
Insulin (uU/mL) 6.26 (4.19–9.24) 8.64 (5.31–15.11) 8.76 (4.7–19.85) <0.001**
HOMA‐IR 1.41 (0.94–2.15) 2.47 (1.50–4.31) 3.56 (1.98–7.78) <0.001**
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 5.63 ± 1.00 6.10 ± 1.15 6.20 ± 1.31 <0.001**
Triglyceride (mmol/L) 1.10 (0.76–1.69) 1.45 (0.90–2.63) 1.96 (1.19–3.61) <0.001**
HDL (mmol/L) 1.40 ± 0.30 1.44 ± 0.38 1.67 ± 0.81 0.026*
LDL (mmol/L) 2.93 ± 0.80 3.16 ± 0.88 3.11 ± 0.81 0.003*
Cigarette smoking, n (%)
Non‐smoker 997 (46.7%) 63 (42.6%) 29 (43.9%) 0.003*
Ex‐smoker 72 (3.4%) 6 (4.1%) 8 (21.1%)
Current smoker 1,067 (50.0%) 79 (53.4%) 29 (43.9%)
Alcohol consumption (yes), n (%) 858 (40.2%) 70 (47.3%) 33 (50.0%) 0.073
Physical activity (yes), n (%) 500 (23.4%) 34 (23.0%) 16 (24.2%) 0.980
Family history for type 2 diabetes (yes), n (%) 79 (3.7%) 7 (4.7%) 6 (9.1%) 0.073
Education levels (years)
0–6 52 (2.4%) 13 (8.8%) 10 (13.8%) <0.001**
7–10 1,359 (63.7%) 101 (68.2%) 41 (63.1%)
>10 723 (33.9%) 34 (23.0%) 15 (23.1%)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). Osteocalcin, insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR): the data were shown as median and interquartile range. The percentage may not sum to 100 because of rounding. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 (one‐way anova and non‐parametric test was used for numerical data, while the χ2‐test with continuity correction or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variable). BMI, body mass index; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.