Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;7(4):522–528. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12439

Table 3.

Logistic regression calculate the odds ratios for type 2 diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose and insulin resistance in the cross‐sectional study

Group‐L (n = 1,177) Group‐H (n = 1,173)
<23.33 ng/mL ≥23.33 ng/mL
T2DM
Unadjusted 1 3.497 (1.955–6.255)**
Model 1 1 2.562 (1.416–4.635)*
Model 2 1 2.759 (1.495–5.089)*
Model 3 1 2.107 (1.123–3.955)*
Model 4 1 1.988 (1.052–3.758)*
IFG
Unadjusted 1 2.657 (1.954–3.613)**
Model 1 1 2.000 (1.457–2.746)**
Model 2 1 2.106 (1.528–2.902)**
Model 3 1 1.752 (1.258–2.439)*
Model 4 1 1.626 (1.162–2.274)*
Insulin resistance
Unadjusted 1 1.754 (1.426–2.159)**
Model 1 1 1.702 (1.372–2.112)**
Model 2 1 1.673 (1.346–2.078)**
Model 3 1 1.359 (1.080–1.710)*
Model 4 1 1.034 (0.807–1.326)

Data were analyzed by odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 (logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios for type 2 diabetes mellitis [T2DM], impaired fasting glucose [IFG] and insulin resistance). Model 1 was adjusted for age. Model 2 was further adjusted for cigarette smoking and education level. Model 3 was further adjusted for total cholesterol, triglyceride, high‐density lipoprotein and low‐density lipoprotein. Model 4 was further adjusted for body mass index. Group‐H, osteocalcin level ≥23.33 ng/mL; group‐L, osteocalcin level <23.33 ng/mL.