Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):241–251. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9748-5

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structural equation model results. The model is fully saturated. Paternal education (not shown) also was included as a control for endogenous variables; paternal education significantly predicted negative relationship schema (β = -0.145 [SE = 0.047]; p < .01), but did not significant predict any other endogenous variables. Direct effects from biological father involvement and from positive social father to each risk behavior outcomes also are not shown (all ps > .05). Correlations for endogenous variables occur with error terms.