Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;115(1):102–107. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.114

Table 2. Distribution of 326 pancreatic cancer case and 652 control patients and corresponding ORsa and 95% CIs by tertiles of three energy-adjusted TAC indices. Italy, 1991–2008.

    Tertilesb
 
  Mean (SD)a I II III P for trend
TEAC 4.39 (2.30)        
 Cases:controls   119:217 105:218 102:217  
 Upper cutoff points (mmol Trolox per day)c   3.67 4.77  
 OR (95% CI)d   1e 0.82 (0.56–1.20) 0.61 (0.39–0.94) 0.028
TRAP 4.51 (2.81)        
 Cases:controls   114:217 105:218 107:217  
 Upper cutoff points (mmol Trolox per day)c   3.47 5.00  
 OR (95% CI)d   1e 0.84 (0.57–1.24) 0.78 (0.49–1.24) 0.27
FRAP 11.23 (5.98)        
 Cases:controls   117:218 111:217 98:217  
 Upper cutoff points (mmol Fe2+ per day)c   9.17 12.29  
 OR (95% CI)d   1e 0.88 (0.61–1.29) 0.63 (0.41–0.99) 0.048

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio; FRAP=ferric-reducing antioxidant power; SC=standard deviation; TAC=total antioxidant capacity; TEAC=Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; TRAP=trapping antioxidant parameter.

a

Mean and s.d. among controls.

b

On the basis of the control distribution.

c

Computed as the sum of the upper cutoff points of energy-adjusted TAC tertiles plus the means of TAC.

d

Estimates from logistic regression models, conditioned on study centre, sex and age, and adjusted for year of interview, education, body mass index, tobacco smoking, alcohol intake, diabetes and energy intake according to the residual method.

e

Reference category.