Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;8(6):1236–1248. doi: 10.18632/aging.100980

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of HDAC4 and survival in patients with ESCC.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variables HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Overall Survival
Gender (Female vs male) 1.034 0.515-2.077 0.925
Age (≥60y vs <60y) 1.558 0.880-2.758 0.129
Tobacco use (yes vs no) 1.068 0.591-1.931 0.827
Alcohol use (yes vs no) 1.207 0.681-2.139 0.520
Tumor location(upper and middle vs lower) 1.494 0.801-2.789 0.207
Tumor length (≥5cm vs <5cm) 1.503 0.835-2.707 0.174
Pathological grade (III vs I-II) 1.646 0.881-3.074 0.118
T stage (III-IV vs I-II) 1.826 0.819-4.072 0.141
N stage (N1-3 vs N0) 3.056 1.628-5.737 0.001 1.443 0.548-3.803 0.458
TNM stage (III vs I-II) 3.264 1.780-5.985 0.000 2.359 1.253-4.443 0.008
HDAC4 expression (high vs low) 3.740 1.969-7.104 0.000 2.846 1.456-5.566 0.002
Progression-Free Survival
Gender (Female vs male) 0.549 0.215-1.399 0.209
Age (≥60y vs <60y) 0.650 0.344-1.228 0.185
Tobacco use (yes vs no) 1.536 0.769-3.067 0.224
Alcohol use (yes vs no) 1.018 0.546-1.895 0.956
Tumor location(upper and middle vs lower) 0.745 0.344-1.614 0.455
Tumor length (≥5cm vs <5cm) 1.235 0.645-2.364 0.525
Pathological grade (III vs I-II) 1.273 0.605-2.678 0.508
T stage (III-IV vs I-II) 1.331 0.614-2.886 0.469
N stage (N1-3 vs N0) 2.670 1.387-5.141 0.003 3.414 1.201-9.708 0.021
TNM stage (III vs I-II) 2.026 1.086-3.781 0.027 0.703 0.261-1.892 0.486
HDAC4 expression (high vs low) 1.762 0.941-3.297 0.077 1.331 0.682-2.597 0.402

NOTE: The bold digit represents P value smaller than 0.05. ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; TNM, tumor node metastasis. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.