Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of HDAC4 and survival in patients with ESCC.
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value |
Overall Survival | ||||||
Gender (Female vs male) | 1.034 | 0.515-2.077 | 0.925 | |||
Age (≥60y vs <60y) | 1.558 | 0.880-2.758 | 0.129 | |||
Tobacco use (yes vs no) | 1.068 | 0.591-1.931 | 0.827 | |||
Alcohol use (yes vs no) | 1.207 | 0.681-2.139 | 0.520 | |||
Tumor location(upper and middle vs lower) | 1.494 | 0.801-2.789 | 0.207 | |||
Tumor length (≥5cm vs <5cm) | 1.503 | 0.835-2.707 | 0.174 | |||
Pathological grade (III vs I-II) | 1.646 | 0.881-3.074 | 0.118 | |||
T stage (III-IV vs I-II) | 1.826 | 0.819-4.072 | 0.141 | |||
N stage (N1-3 vs N0) | 3.056 | 1.628-5.737 | 0.001 | 1.443 | 0.548-3.803 | 0.458 |
TNM stage (III vs I-II) | 3.264 | 1.780-5.985 | 0.000 | 2.359 | 1.253-4.443 | 0.008 |
HDAC4 expression (high vs low) | 3.740 | 1.969-7.104 | 0.000 | 2.846 | 1.456-5.566 | 0.002 |
Progression-Free Survival | ||||||
Gender (Female vs male) | 0.549 | 0.215-1.399 | 0.209 | |||
Age (≥60y vs <60y) | 0.650 | 0.344-1.228 | 0.185 | |||
Tobacco use (yes vs no) | 1.536 | 0.769-3.067 | 0.224 | |||
Alcohol use (yes vs no) | 1.018 | 0.546-1.895 | 0.956 | |||
Tumor location(upper and middle vs lower) | 0.745 | 0.344-1.614 | 0.455 | |||
Tumor length (≥5cm vs <5cm) | 1.235 | 0.645-2.364 | 0.525 | |||
Pathological grade (III vs I-II) | 1.273 | 0.605-2.678 | 0.508 | |||
T stage (III-IV vs I-II) | 1.331 | 0.614-2.886 | 0.469 | |||
N stage (N1-3 vs N0) | 2.670 | 1.387-5.141 | 0.003 | 3.414 | 1.201-9.708 | 0.021 |
TNM stage (III vs I-II) | 2.026 | 1.086-3.781 | 0.027 | 0.703 | 0.261-1.892 | 0.486 |
HDAC4 expression (high vs low) | 1.762 | 0.941-3.297 | 0.077 | 1.331 | 0.682-2.597 | 0.402 |
NOTE: The bold digit represents P value smaller than 0.05. ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; TNM, tumor node metastasis. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.