Skip to main content
Drug Metabolism and Disposition logoLink to Drug Metabolism and Disposition
. 2016 Jul;44(7):1070–1079. doi: 10.1124/dmd.116.069518

Characterization of Atomoxetine Biotransformation and Implications for Development of PBPK Models for Dose Individualization in Children

Jean C Dinh 1,, Robin E Pearce 1, Leon Van Haandel 1, Andrea Gaedigk 1, J Steven Leeder 1
PMCID: PMC4931890  PMID: 27052878

Abstract

Atomoxetine (ATX) is a second-line nonstimulant medication used to control symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Inconsistent therapeutic efficacy has been reported with ATX, which may be related to variable CYP2D6-mediated drug clearance. We characterized ATX metabolism in a panel of human liver samples as a basis for a bottom-up PBPK model to aid in ATX exposure prediction and control. Km, Vmax, and Clint values in pooled human liver microsomes (HLMs) were 2.4 µM, 479 pmol/min/mg protein, and 202 µl/min/mg protein, respectively. Mean population values of kinetic parameters are not adequate to describe variability in a population, given that Km, Vmax, and Clint values from single-donor HLMs ranged from 0.93 to 79.2 µM, 20.0 to 1600 pmol/min/mg protein, and 0.3 to 936 µl/min/mg protein. All kinetic parameters were calculated from 4-hydroxyatomoxetine (4-OH-ATX) formation. CYP2E1 and CYP3A contributed to 4-OH-ATX formation in livers with CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizer status. In HLMs with lower CYP2D6 activity levels, 2-hydroxymethylatomoxetine (2-CH2OH-ATX) formation became a more predominant pathway of metabolism, which appeared to be catalyzed by CYP2B6. ATX biotransformation at clinically relevant plasma concentrations was characterized in a panel of pediatric HLM (n = 116) samples by evaluating primary metabolites. Competing pathways of ATX metabolism [N-desmethylatomoxetine (NDM-ATX) and 2-CH2OH-ATX formation] had increasing importance in livers with lesser CYP2D6 activity, but, overall ATX clearance was still compromised. Modeling ATX exposure to individualize therapy would require comprehensive knowledge of factors that affect CYP2D6 activity as well as an understanding of competing pathways, particularly for individuals with lower CYP2D6 activity.

Introduction

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder among children. In the United States, the prevalence of ADHD among school-aged children is approximately 9.5%, and world-wide prevalence is approximately 5.3% (Feldman and Reiff, 2014). Pharmacological intervention is a key component of ADHD symptomatic relief (Feldman and Reiff, 2014). Children who receive suboptimal care for their symptoms may fail to thrive academically and socially, the effects of which can persist into adulthood (Asherson et al., 2012). Currently, first-line therapies are stimulants, which include methylphenidate and amphetamine derivatives. Nonstimulants, such as atomoxetine (ATX) and centrally acting α2-adrenergic agonists, are considered second-line therapies. ATX was originally considered to be a viable nonstimulant alternative to stimulants, particularly where first line therapy was contraindicated. However, its use has declined since being introduced into the market in 2003 (Chai et al., 2012), which may be because of its variable efficacy. A retrospective analysis of pooled randomized control trials involving ATX (IDEA study) found response during the acute phase of treatment (6–9 weeks) to be bimodal, with 40% of patients being nonresponders (Newcorn et al., 2009). An understanding of the mechanistic reasons for variability in ATX response may permit more precise drug selection and dosing strategies.

ATX exposure, as measured by maximum concentration or calculating area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), has been associated with response (Michelson et al., 2007). CYP2D6-mediated oxidative metabolism is the major route of ATX clearance, and polymorphisms of the CYP2D6 gene likely contribute to the variability in drug exposure. Data from clinical studies indicated that individuals who are genotyped as poor metabolizers (PMs) have a longer half-life, and higher Cmax, Cmin, and drug exposure compared with extensive metabolizers (EMs) (Sauer et al., 2005). The current labeling for ATX does not require any change in starting dose based on CYP2D6 genotype or phenotype, because the results of initial studies were interpreted as indicating that physicians could adequately dose ATX without prior knowledge of projected CYP2D6 activity (Trzepacz et al., 2008). Alternatively, dose adjustment should be based on weight of the child to accommodate the effect of growth and development on the dose-exposure relationship (Witcher et al., 2003). A recent review concluded that considerable time is needed to achieve a therapeutic response, which can be a frustrating period for patients and their families (Savill et al., 2015).

A CYP2D6 genotype-stratified pharmacokinetic study of ATX conducted by our group (Brown et al., 2015) revealed an 11.4-fold difference in mean dose-corrected AUCs between CYP2D6 PMs and EMs. More importantly, there was a 30-fold range in dose-corrected AUC values among all participants given nominally the same dose. Of particular note was the four- to fivefold variability in dose-corrected AUC within each of the EM groups (one and two functional CYP2D6 allele groups) and the considerable absolute interindividual variability in AUC within the PM group. Furthermore, urinary recovery of parent drug and metabolites revealed that 4-hydroxyatomoxetine (4-OH-ATX), the primary CYP2D6-mediated metabolite, was the single most abundant metabolite formed, regardless of CYP2D6 genotype, including the PM group. In addition, carboxyl-hydroxyl ATX metabolites resulting from sequential metabolism of initial 2-methylhydroxylation, which have not been quantified in earlier human studies, represented a significant percentage of recovered metabolites in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers (IMs, defined as genotypes consisting of a partial function allele and a null allele) and PMs. Formation of N-desmethylatomoxetine (NDM-ATX) was relatively minor compared with that of other metabolites. The relative contribution of competing ATX metabolic pathways (N-demethylation and 2-methylhydroxylation) was a function of CYP2D6 activity, and the results of this study further emphasized the importance of characterizing the CYPs contributing to 4-OH-ATX and 2-methyl-hydroxyl-ATX (2-CH2OH-ATX) formation, especially under conditions where CYP2D6 activity is compromised (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Scheme of ATX metabolism in vivo. Figure reproduced and modified from Mattiuz et al. (2003) with permission from Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

Evaluating the interplay of pathways responsible for ATX metabolism in a comprehensive pediatric system is also critical for developing tools to better dose children. In preparation for building a bottom-up physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model as a computational engine to estimate and predict ATX exposure in children, the purpose of this study was to: 1) investigate the sources of variability in ATX biotransformation within the same CYP2D6 genotype/activity score class; 2) identify other CYP isoforms contributing to ATX metabolism, particularly in the scenario of lower CYP2D6 activity; and 3) characterize the relative contribution of all pathways of ATX metabolism in a pediatric context.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Reagents.

ATX, 4-OH-ATX, 4-OH-ATX-d3, NDM-ATX, NDM-ATX-d7, montelukast sodium salt, and (S)-(+)-N-3-benzylnirvanol were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, ON, Canada). Ketoconazole was obtained from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2′-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt hydrate, α-naphthoflavone, tranylcypromine, thiotepa, montelukast, sulfaphenazole, and quinidine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other reagents were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Heterologously expressed cytochrome P450 enzymes (Cypex Bactosomes Dundee, United Kingdom), adult and pediatric single-donor HLMs, and pooled human HLMs (n = 200 donors) were purchased from XenoTech LLC (Lenexa, KS). HLMs prepared from liver samples from pediatric donors were obtained through the Liver Tissue Cell Distribution System (Minneapolis, MN; Pittsburgh, PA), National Institutes of Health #N01-DK-7-0004/HHSN267200700004C, #HHSN276201200017C, the University of Maryland Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders, and XenoTech LLC, and have been described elsewhere (Pearce et al., 2015).

Michaelis-Menten Kinetic Parameter Experiments.

Kinetic experiments were initially conducted in pooled HLMs to obtain a mean population reference. In addition, kinetic experiments were also performed in 21 single-donor HLMs stratified by genotype using activity score (AS) as a qualitative measure of predicted phenotype (Gaedigk et al., 2008). Briefly, a CYP2D6 AS is calculated from the CYP2D6 genotype. Fully functional alleles having similar activity to wild-type are given a score of one. Allelic variants that have been reported to result in a decreased activity are given a score of 0.5, and nonfunctional allelic variants are assigned a value of 0. The CYP2D6 AS of an individual is the sum of the scores for each copy of the CYP2D6 gene present. These experiments were conducted to evaluate variability in the kinetic parameters of associated with ATX metabolism. CYP2D6 AS and number of HLMs are as follows: AS = 0, n = 2; AS = 0.5, n = 1; AS = 1, n = 8; AS = 2, n = 8; AS = 3, n = 2. Metabolite formation was linear with respect to protein (up to 0.25 mg/ml) and time (up to 10 minutes) in pooled HLMs. For single-donor adult HLMs with a CYP2D6 AS ≥ 1, incubations were performed in the following manner: 0.03 mg/ml protein (final concentration) was preincubated at 37°C with ATX (0.2–20 μM, final concentration) for 5 minutes in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer. The reaction was initiated with 1 mM NADPH (final concentration). The reaction volume was 100 μl. The reaction was quenched after 5 minutes with ice-cold acetonitrile (50 μl) containing internal standards and vortexed. Because substrate turnover is reduced in single-donor adult HLMs with a CYP2D6 AS of 0 and 0.5, incubations were modified to contain a final increased protein concentration of 0.1 mg/ml and an increased range of ATX concentrations (0.2–1500 μM) to approach enzyme saturating conditions. Kinetic parameters in pooled HLMs were determined using both conditions mentioned previously. Negative control reactions were prepared in pooled HLMs. These included reactions that did not contain one of the following: substrate, enzyme, or NADPH. Reaction vials were subjected to centrifugation at 16,300 g for 10 minutes to precipitate protein using a Spectrafuge 24D (Labnet International Inc., Edison, NJ). Supernatant was collected and analyzed via ultra performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). All reactions were performed in duplicate.

Heterologously Expressed Cytochrome P450 Screen.

A screen of heterologously expressed CYP enzymes was conducted at clinically relevant concentrations of ATX to determine CYP isoforms involved in formation of the three primary ATX metabolites. Two picomoles of heterologously expressed enzyme (Cypex Bactosomes) were preincubated with ATX (1, 3, or 10 μM) at 37°C for 5 minutes in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer and 100 μl volumes. The reaction was initiated with 1 mM NADPH (final concentration) and was quenched after 5 minutes with ice-cold acetonitrile (50 μl) containing internal standards and vortexed. Each reaction vial was subject to centrifugation at 16,000 g for 10 minutes to precipitate protein using an AccuSpin 1R centrifuge (Fisher Scientific, Lenexa, KS). Supernatant was collected and analyzed via UPLC-MS/MS. All reactions were performed in duplicate. The following CYP enzymes + reductase (+/− cytochrome b5) were screened: CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9 + cytochrome b5, CYP2C18, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 + cytochrome b5, CYP2J2, CYP3A4, CYP3A4 + cytochrome b5, CYP3A5 + cytochrome b5, CYP3A7 + cytochrome b5, CYP4A11, and vector (negative enzyme control).

Chemical Inhibition Experiments.

Inhibition experiments were conducted in pooled HLMs, an adult single-donor HLM with a CYP2D6 AS = 0.5 (CYP2D6 *4/*41), and an adult single-donor HLM with a CYP2D6 AS = 0 (CYP2D6 *4/*5) to understand CYP contribution to ATX metabolism with decreasing CYP2D6 activity. For pooled HLM incubations, 0.03 mg/ml protein was preincubated with 2 μM ATX + inhibitor at 37°C for 5 minutes in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer. The reaction was initiated with 1 mM NAPDH (final concentration). The reaction volume was 100 μl. The reaction was quenched after 5 minutes with 50 μl ice-cold acetonitrile containing internal standards and vortexed. For the adult single-donor HLM with a CYP2D6 AS = 0.5, reaction conditions were modified to increase substrate turnover, as described above. The final protein and substrate concentration achieved was 0.2 mg/ml and 5 μM, respectively. The total reaction time was 10 minutes. For the adult single-donor HLM with a CYP2D6 AS = 0, reaction conditions were modified to contain a final protein concentration of 0.5 mg/ml, final ATX concentration of 10 μM, and the total reaction time was increased to 30 minutes. Inhibition experiments with single-donor adult HLMs did not include a preincubation period. All reactions were performed in triplicate. The following CYP isoforms were assayed (specific chemical inhibitor; final concentrations in incubations): CYP1A (α-napthoflavone; 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, and 5 μM); CYP2A6 (tranylcypromine; 0.18, 0.6, 1.8, and 6 μM); CYP2B6 (thiotepa; 1.5, 5, 15, 50 μM); CYP2C8 (montelukast; 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5 μM); CYP2C9 (sulfaphenazole; 0.3, 1, 3, 10 μM); CYP2C19 [(S)-(+)-N-benzylnirvanol; 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 μM]; CYP2D6 (quinidine; 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5 μM); CYP2E1 (4-methylpyrazole; 1.8, 6, 18, 60 μM); and CYP3A (ketoconazole; 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1 μM). The lowest concentration of inhibitor was chosen to approximate Ki, which would result in 50% inhibition of the selected CYP isoform at a substrate concentration that was less than or equal to Km and therapeutically relevant (whichever was lower). The highest concentration of inhibitor was selected so that most enzymatic activity is inhibited (Khojasteh et al., 2011). An incubation containing only solvent (i.e., without inhibitor) was performed for each specific inhibitor experiment as a positive control. Negative controls reactions were prepared in pooled HLMs. These included reactions that did not contain one of the following: substrate, enzyme, or NADPH. Reaction vials were subject to centrifugation at 16,300 g for 10 minutes to precipitate protein using a Spectrafuge 24D (Labnet International Inc.). Supernatant was collected and analyzed via UPLC-MS/MS.

Genotyping of Pediatric HLMs.

All pediatric livers were genotyped for common allelic variants of CYP2D6, CYP2B6, and CYP2C19. CYP2D6 genotyping was carried out as previously described (Gaedigk et al., 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010a, b, 2012). Briefly, CYP2D6 genotyping was conducted by amplifying a 6.6-kb long-range (XL) fragment with CYP2D6-specific primers and subsequently used as a template for TaqMan (*2-4, *6, *7, *9, *10, *17, *29, *36, and *40-*42; Thermo-Fisher Scientific, formerly Life Technologies, Foster City, CA) genotyping assays. Six-microliter reactions were conducted in 96-well plates using the TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix (Life Technologies) or the KAPA Probe qPCR Master Mix (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, MA). Cycling was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7900 Real Time PCR System, according to manufacturer’s specifications and data analyzed with the SDS2.4 software. The exon 9 conversion defining CYP2D6*36 was genotyped from genomic DNA using a duplex PCR assay (Gaedigk et al., 2006), and the presence of a *45 or *46 allele was determined by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (Gaedigk et al., 2005). The CYP2D6*5 gene deletion, the presence of gene duplications/multiplications and CYP2D7/2D6 hybrid genes were assayed by XL-PCR and/or our quantitative gene copy number assay (Gaedigk et al., 2012). To genotype gene duplications, an 8.6-kb-long XL-PCR product encompassing the duplicated gene copy was generated (Gaedigk et al., 2012) and the amplified fragment genotyped for the presence of sequence variations as described above. Genotypes were translated into activity scores as described in Michaelis-Menten Kinetic Parameter Experiments according to Gaedigk et al. (2008). CYP2B6 genotyping was carried out as described (PMID 23746185 and 26608082). Briefly, rs34223104 (-82T>C), rs3745274 (516G>T, Q172H), rs28399499 (983T>C, I328T), and rs3211371 (1459C>T R487C) were genotyped using TaqMan assays, and rs2279343 (785A>G, K262R) was genotyped by high-resolution melt analysis. PHASE (version 2.1) software was used to construct haplotypes from genotype data as described (Stephens and Donnelly, 2003; Stephens et al., 2001). CYP2C19*2-*4, and *17 were genotyped using TaqMan genotyping assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) assays. Alleles were defined according to the Human Cytochrome P450 Allele Nomenclature Database at www.cypalleles.ki.se/.

Characterization of ATX Biotransformation by Pediatric HLMs.

ATX biotransformation by all three primary routes of oxidative biotransformation was characterized in a set of pediatric HLMs ranging in age from 0.01 to 18 years with known CYP2D6, CYP2B6, and CYP2C19 genotype to determine the relative contribution of age and genotype to the observed variability in metabolite formation. Pediatric HLMs (0.03 mg/ml final concentration; n = 116), regardless of CYP2D6 AS, were preincubated with ATX (1, 3, or 10 μM, final concentration) at 37°C for 5 minutes in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer. The reaction was initiated with 1 mM NADPH (final concentration). The reaction volume was 100 µl. The reaction was quenched after 5 minutes with 50 μl ice-cold acetonitrile containing internal standards and vortexed. Negative controls reactions were prepared in pooled HLMs. These included reactions that did not contain one of the following: substrate, enzyme, or NADPH. Each reaction vial was subject to centrifugation at 16,000 g for 10 minutes to precipitate protein using an AccuSpin 1R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Supernatant was collected and analyzed via UPLC-MS/MS. All reactions were performed in duplicate.

UPLC-MS/MS Sample Processing.

All samples were analyzed using an UPLC-MS/MS method previously developed and validated in our laboratory (Van Haandel et al., manuscript in preparation). Briefly, 10 µl of deproteinated samples were applied to a Waters Acquity UPLC C18 reversed phase column (BEH 1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm) in tandem with a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK). Aqueous mobile phase consisted of 90% 10 mM ammonium formate pH = 3.5, 10% methanol (solvent A), and organic mobile phase consisted of 10% 10 mM ammonium formate pH = 3.5, 90% methanol (solvent B). The UPLC gradient used is as follows: initial conditions at the beginning of the gradient were 30% solvent B for 0.10 minute; the percentage of B was increased linearly to 70% at 1.30 minutes, and this percentage was maintained until 2.30 minutes; the percentage of B decreased linearly to initial conditions at 2.35 minutes, and the column was allowed to re-equilibrate until 3.00 minutes. The following mass and corresponding fragments were monitored: 4-OH-ATX (m/z 272.2 > 44), 4-OH-ATX-d3 (m/z 275.2 > 47), NDM-ATX (m/z 242.04 > 134), NDM-ATX-d7 (m/z 249.1 > 133.98), 2-CH2OH-ATX (m/z 272.2 > 150).

Data Analysis.

Kinetic parameter determination in pooled and adult single donor HLMs were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.02 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). 4-OH-ATX formation rate, calculated as picomole 4-OH-ATX formed, corrected for time and protein content, was plotted against ATX concentration and analyzed using a single-enzyme + one substrate Michaelis-Menten model. Values of Km and Vmax were obtained from the fitted model. Clint was then calculated as Vmax/Km. Linear regression analysis was subsequently used to describe the association between CYP2D6 activity as measured by dextromethorphan O-demethylation activity (data provided by XenoTech LLC) and calculated Clint. Formation rate of 4-OH-ATX and NDM-ATX metabolites in heterologously expressed enzymes was calculated as picomole of metabolite formed, corrected for both time in minutes and picomole of CYP enzyme in the reaction. Because an authentic standard for 2-CH2OH-ATX was commercially unavailable, the formation rate was determined as NDM-ATX equivalents. These values were compared with the mean formation rate of metabolite of the vector negative control to determine formation rate of metabolite. Only formation rates and area ratios that were higher than 20% of negative controls are reported. For specific chemical inhibition experiments, mean percentage inhibition was calculated by taking the ratio of mean picomole metabolite formed in experiments that included inhibitor and mean picomole metabolite formed in no inhibitor positive control. This value was subtracted from 1 and multiplied by 100 (eq. 1). Mean and standard deviation are reported in results. Inhibition that was greater than 20% was considered experimentally credible.

graphic file with name dmd.116.069518eq1.jpg

Formation rates of 4-OH-ATX and NDM-ATX metabolites in pediatric HLMs were calculated as picomole of metabolite formed, corrected for both time in minutes and milligrams of protein in the reaction. As no standard for 2-CH2OH-ATX was commercially available, 2-CH2OH-ATX formation was reported as NDM-ATX equivalents. Median and range of formation rates are reported for each concentration of ATX screened (Table 2, Supplemental Table 2, Supplemental Table 3). One-way analyses of variance (one-way ANOVA) were performed to determine genetic factors that could influence formation of ATX metabolites (Norman, 2010). A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These analyses were done using data generated with an ATX concentration of 10 µM because this concentration approximates Vmax and differences in metabolism rates because varying CYP2D6 activity can be detected. Additional one-way ANOVA was conducted on log transformed data (excluding CYP2D6 AS = 0) because the data from formation rates is not normally distributed. The conclusions from the statistical tests from the raw and log-transformed data were in agreement and these data are not shown.

TABLE 2.

Formation rate of 4-OH-ATX, NDM-ATX, and 2-CH2OH-ATX in NDM-ATX equivalents, stratified by CYP2D6 genotype

Data are from incubations conducted at ATX 3 μM. All experiments conducted in duplicate.

Pediatric HLM Bank Screen with 3 μM ATX (median and range)
CYP2D6 AS (n) 4'-hydroxy-ATX Formation Rate N-desmethyl-ATX Formation Rate 2-methyl-OH-ATX Formation Rate
pmol/min/mg
0 (10) 0 (0–0) 25.1 (18.9–55.0) 15.4 (5.70–185.0)
0.5 (5) 89.6 (10.5–328) 35.4 (18.4–49.2) 35.6 (13.5–98.7)
1 (34) 93.3 (6.10–445) 36.8 (18.0–62.8) 39.7 (5.8–252)
1.5(20) 210 (0.5–489.0) 39.3 (18.1–54.5) 60.2 (8.70–481)
2+(47) 186 (0–1540) 30.3 (15.7–74.2) 32.2 (5.40–382.5)

Results

Michaelis-Menten Experiments.

Km and Vmax values using 4-OH-ATX formation from pooled HLMs were 2.3 μM and 479 pmol/min/mg protein using conditions for HLMs with a CYP2D6 AS > 1, resulting in a Clint = 202 μl/min/mg protein. For Km and Vmax determined from this same pool using experimental conditions used for HLMs with a CYP2D6 AS = 0 or 0.5, values of 2.1 μM and 357 pmol/min/mg protein were obtained (Clint = 168 μl/min/mg protein). The decrease in Vmax in the latter experiment may be due to either substrate or metabolite inhibition at higher ATX concentrations (data not shown). Overall, Km values varied ∼100 fold (range = 0.7–79.2 μM), and Vmax values varied ∼80 fold (range = 20–1600 pmol/min/mg protein) among all single-donor HLM samples analyzed (Table 1, Fig. 2). Values of Clint varied ∼3000-fold in the single-donor HLMs (range = 0.3–936 μl/min/mg protein). Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between CYP2D6 activity (dextrorphan formation) and ATX Clint (r2 = 0.74, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). Interestingly, less variation was noted within HLM preparations where CYP2D6 AS ≥ 1 for Km, which varied only approximately sixfold (0.7–4.5 μM). However, for these same livers, Vmax exhibited considerably more variation, ∼60-fold (range = 28–1600 pmol/min/mg protein) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Demographic information and kinetic parameters derived from 4-OH-ATX formation in 21 individual human liver microsomal preparations of varying CYP2D6 genotype and activity score

HLM # CYP2D6 Genotype Activity Score M/F Age Race§ Km Vmax Clint
µM pmol/min/mg protein µl/min/mg protein
H0033 *4/*5 0 M 44 C 79.2 20.0 0.253
H0486 *4/*5 0 F 49 C 59.1* 4.64* NA
H0446 *4/*41 0.5 M 21 C 5.35 30.9 5.78
H0439 *1/*4 1 F 78 C 0.930 406 437
H0455 *1/*4 1 F 37 C 0.945 436 461
H0028 *2/*3 1 F 20 C 1.32 251 190
H0157 *2/*4 1 F 50 C 1.33 188 141
H0021 *1/*4 1 M 19 C 0.737 123 167
H0025 *1/*4 1 F 30 C 1.07 131 122
H0115 *2/*4 1 F 48 C 2.40 28.0 11.7
H0138 *2/*4 1 F 70 C 1.30 71.7 55.2
H0153 *1/*1 2 F 63 C 1.01 352 348
H0155 *1/*1 2 M 46 H 1.65 360 218
H0059 *1/*2 2 M 9 C 1.33 791 595
H0485 *1/*2 2 M 10 C 1.50 479 319
H0120 *1/*2 2 F 57 C 1.34 141 105
H0268 *1/*1 2 M 0 C 1.81 417 230
H0493 *1/*1 2 F 64 C 1.33 289 217
H0134 *2/*2 2 F 61 C 4.59 252 55.0
H0099 *1/*2x2 3 M 6 C 1.71 1600 936
H0289 *1/*2x2 3 F 60 C 1.94 1220 629
Average 5.64 379 262
*

Clint was not calculated for HLM H0486 because there were not enough points above the limit of quantitation to provide accurate estimates of Km.

M = male, F = female

§

C = Caucasian, H = Hispanic

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Michaelis-Menten plots of 4-OH-ATX formation in 21 single-donor HLMs of varying CYP2D6 phenotype. Extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers are plotted in (A), whereas intermediate and poor metabolizers are plotted in (B). Extensive metabolizers were individuals with a CYP2D6 AS = 1–2. Extensive metabolizers were subcategorized as EM1 (green plots) or EM2 (blue plots), depending on CYP2D6 AS. Ultra-rapid metabolizers (UMs) were individuals with an AS > 2 (purple plots). Intermediate metabolizers (IMs) are individuals with a CYP2D6 AS = 0.5, which indicates one copy of a CYP2D6 allele with compromised activity (yellow plot). Poor metabolizers (PMs) have two no function CYP2D6 alleles (red plots). (PM, n = 2; IM, n = 1; EM1, n = 8, EM2 = 8, UM, n = 2).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Linear regression analysis evaluating ATX intrinsic clearance (Clint) and CYP2D6 activity measured by dextromethorphan (DM) O-demethylation activity. Clint was calculated by taking the ratio of Vmax/Km from data obtained from 4-OH-ATX formation. Data from CYP2D6 phenotypic activity was provided by Xenotech, LLC. Data from 20 HLMs was included in this analysis, because one PM HLM preparation did not produce a reliable estimate of Km (r2 = 0.74, ***p < 0.0001). UM = purple dots, EM2 = blue dots, EM1 = green dots, IM = yellow dot, PM = red dot.

Heterologously Expressed Cytochrome P450 Screen.

CYP2D6 generated 4-OH-ATX to the greatest extent regardless of the substrate concentration evaluated (1, 3, or 10 µM) followed by CYP2J2. Formation rates of 4-OH-ATX for CYP2J2 were approximately 100-fold lower than that of CYP2D6. No other CYP isoforms studied formed 4-OH-ATX. NDM-ATX was formed by CYP1A1, CYP2B6, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2J2, and CYP3A4. Of these isoforms, CYP2C18 generated NDM-ATX to the greatest extent, in contrast to previous studies citing that formation of this metabolite is mainly mediated by CYP2C19 (Ring et al., 2002). It should be noted that previous studies did not evaluate CYP2C18, most likely because of the fact that CYP2C18 has been shown to have low levels of hepatic expression (Lapple et al., 2003). Allelic variation in this gene is, therefore, not likely to impact NDM-ATX formation. CYP2C18 and CYP2C19 generated this metabolite to a comparable extent, with CYP2C19 formation rate being 85% of CYP2C18 formation rate at the highest concentration of ATX used. All other isoforms had formation rates that were 40–75% of CYP2C18 formation rate at the highest concentration of ATX studied. CYP2B6 and CYP2D6 had the highest rates of 2-CH2OH-ATX formation. CYP1A1, CYP2J2, CYP3A4 (with and without cytochrome b5) also formed 2-CH2OH-ATX, however to a lesser extent than CYP2B6 and CYP2D6 (Fig. 4, Supplemental Table 1).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Formation rate of 4-OH-ATX (A), NDM-ATX (B), and 2-CH2OH-ATX (expressed as NDM-ATX equivalents) (C) in heterologously expressed CYP enzymes incubated with ATX (1, 3, and 10 μM). Only those CYPs isoforms that displayed a concentration-dependent increase of metabolite formation that was greater than the limit of quantitation or the rate of formation by the negative control (vector) are shown. All experiments were conducted in duplicate.

Chemical Inhibition Experiments.

In pooled HLMs, only quinidine and 4-methylpyrazole inhibited the formation of 4-OH-ATX in a concentration-dependent manner. At the highest concentration of quinidine, the percent inhibition of 4-OH-ATX formed was 98.2 ± 0.6%. Percent inhibition of 4-OH-ATX formed was 74.0 ± 1.8% at the highest concentration of 4-methylpyrazole used. The same two CYP isoforms also contributed to 4-OH-ATX formation in the adult HLM with a CYP2D6 AS = 0.5. Percent inhibition at the highest concentration of quinidine and 4-methylpyrazole was 93.3 ± 0.9% and 58.5 ± 3.4%, respectively. In the adult HLM with a CYP2D6 AS = 0, tranylcypromine, 4-methylpyrazole, and ketoconzole inhibited 4-OH-ATX formation in a concentration-dependent manner. At the highest concentration of each of the three inhibitors, 4-OH-ATX formation inhibition was 40.6 ± 3.3% with tranylcypromine, 47.8 ± 1.6% with 4-methylpyrazole, and 80.4 ± 0.6% with ketoconazole (Fig. 5). 2-CH2OH-ATX formation inhibition was only analyzed in single-donor adult livers. In the HLM preparation with a CYP2D6 AS = 0.5, only incubations with tranylcypromine exhibited some concentration-dependent inhibition of 2-CH2OH-ATX formation, implying a role for CYP2A6 in the formation of this metabolite. However, the CYP2A6 contribution to metabolite formation appears to be low, with the mean percent inhibition at the highest concentration of tranylcypromine being 23.6 ± 4.9%. In the HLM preparation with a CYP2D6 AS = 0, CYP2A6 and CYP2B6 appear to contribute to formation of 2-CH2OH-ATX. At the highest concentration of tranylcypromine and thiotepa, percent inhibition was 53.6 ± 4.5% and 51.0% ± 5.0% (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Relative percentages of 4-OH-ATX and 2-CH2OH-ATX formed when ATX coincubated with chemical inhibitors of specific CYP isoforms. Relative formation of 4-OH-ATX are reported with pooled HLMs (A) as well as adult single-donor HLMs with CYP2D6 AS = 0.5 (B) and 0 (C). Relative formation of 2-CH2OH-ATX are reported with adult single donor HLMs with CYP2D6 AS = 0.5 (D) and 0 (E). All HLM preparations were obtained from Xenotech, LLC. All experiments were conducted in triplicate.

Characterization of ATX Biotransformation by Pediatric HLMs.

ATX biotransformation by pediatric HLMS was conducted at three concentrations of ATX that reflected systemic plasma drug levels, bracketing an inferred target Cmax of 3 µM (Kratochvil et al., 2007; Michelson et al., 2007). Concentration-dependent metabolite formation was observed for all metabolites analyzed, and the results are shown in Table 2, Supplemental Tables 2 and 3. In general, median formation rates of 4-OH-ATX increased in parallel with CYP2D6 AS, although the pediatric HLMs with AS = 0.5 (n = 5) had higher median formation rates than livers with AS = 1 (n = 34). The median value for HLMs with AS = 0.5 may not be accurate because of the small sample size. The 4-OH-ATX formation rates exhibited a wider range of values with increasing CYP2D6 AS at each concentration of ATX assayed. Within each CYP2D6 AS group and ATX concentration screened, formation rates of NDM-ATX and 2-CH2OH-ATX did not vary appreciably. However, the relative contribution of these competing pathways to overall ATX biotransformation increased with decreasing CYP2D6 AS (Table 2, Supplemental Tables 2 and 3). Formation rates of metabolites were stratified by AS (CYPD6) or genotype (CYP2C19 and CYP2B6) (Fig. 6). One-way ANOVA was conducted using data from the 10 μM screen, i.e., Vmax concentrations, to better understand how genotype affects CYP activity. Mean formation rates of 4-OH-ATX differed significantly between livers of differing CYP2D6 AS scores (p = 0.03). Subsequent correction for multiple testing using the Bonferonni method evaluating livers containing CYP2D6 activity (i.e., AS = 0 livers not included in this analysis) found that significant differences between livers with an AS score = 1 and an AS = 2 persisted. However, there were no other significant differences between other genotype-predicted phenotype groups. There was not a significant association between age and 4-OH-ATX formation rates (Fig. 7). Although data from the current investigation indicates that CYP2C18 also plays a substantial role in NDM-ATX formation, much of the current literature suggests that CYP2C19 is the major isoform that mediates formation of this metabolite. For this reason, only CYP2C19 genotype effects were evaluated. For ease of data interpretation, CYP2C19 genetic variants *2–*4 were classified as no function alleles (*0) as these are associated with no activity according to the CPIC term standardization project (https://www.pharmgkb.org/page/cpicTermProject). CYP2C19 genotype groups were stratified in the following manner: *0/*0 (class 1), *0/*1(class 2), *0/*17 (class 3), *1/*1 (class 4), *1/*17 (class 5), and *17/*17 (class 6). There was no statistically significant effect of CYP2C19 genotype on mean formation rate of NDM-ATX was observed (p = 0.10). However, formation of NDM-ATX in livers genotyped as CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (*0/*0) did appear to be lower, whereas CYP2C19 *17/*17 formation rates appeared higher, consistent with genotype-predicted phenotype. It is important to note that NDM-ATX formation was still present in livers genotyped as class 1, most likely because other CYP isoforms can form this metabolite (Fig. 6). Similar to 4-OH-ATX formation, no statistically significant effect of age on NDM-ATX formation was observed (Fig. 7). Formation of 2-CH2OH-ATX was stratified by CYP2B6 genotype. Because of the numerous CYP2B6 allelic variants detected and because CYP2B6 genotype effects may result in substrate-dependent phenotypes, all allelic variants of this gene were collated and categorized as “*X.” CYP2B6 genotype groups were stratified in the following manner: *X/*X, *X/*1, and *1/*1. One-way ANOVA provided evidence that CYP2B6 genotype does not appear to influence mean 2-CH2OH-ATX formation (p = 0.30) (Fig. 6). As with the other metabolites analyzed, age did not influence formation of this metabolite (Fig. 7). A complete list of patient demographics and metabolite formation rates are included in Supplemental Table 4.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

ATX metabolite formation stratified by CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2B6 genotype. These three CYPs are the most important contributors to 4-OH-ATX formation. Data from the 10 μM ATX pediatric HLM screen were used for these analyses. 4-OH-ATX formation rate is stratified by CYP2D6 activity score (A), NDM-ATX formation rate by CYP2C19 genotype (B), and 2-CH2OH-ATX formation rate (expressed as NDM-ATX equivalents) by CYP2B6 genotype (C). Livers genotyped as CYP2C19 *2, *3, or *4 were collated as nonfunctional alleles (i.e., *0) because all have been reported to result in loss of activity. Because of the numerous number of allelic variants detected for CYP2B6, genotype groups were categorized as homozygous wild-type (*1/*1), heterozygous (*1/*X), and homozygous variant (*X/*X). All experiments were conducted in duplicate.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Formation of 4-OH-ATX (A), NDM-ATX (B), and 2-CH2OH-ATX (expressed as NDM-ATX equivalents) (C) as a function of age. This figure was generated using data from the pediatric HLM screen with 10 µM screen. A total of 116 individual livers was evaluated in duplicate 4-OH-ATX.

Discussion

Although a predominant role for CYP2D6 in the disposition of ATX has been documented by several studies both in vitro (Ring et al., 2002) and in vivo (Witcher et al., 2003; Cui et al., 2007; Matsui et al., 2012; Brown et al., 2015), other factors also contribute to variability in the dose-exposure relationship, because two- to fivefold variability in apparent oral clearance can be observed within a CYP2D6 genotype-predicted phenotype group in vivo (Matsui et al., 2012; Brown et al., 2015). The objectives of this investigation were threefold: 1) investigate the sources of variability in ATX biotransformation within a CYP2D6 genotype/activity score group; 2) identify other CYP isoforms contributing to ATX biotransformation, particularly in the scenario of lower CYP2D6 activity; and 3) characterize the relative contribution of all pathways of ATX metabolism in a pediatric context, where the influences of CYP genotype, maturation, and development may be evaluated. Further understanding of these three aims will help individualize ATX dosing in children. The first major observation from these studies is that CYP2D6 activity is associated with 74% of the variability observed with ATX Clint when calculated using the kinetic parameters of 4-OH-ATX formation in vitro (Fig. 3). In livers genotyped with at least one functional CYP2D6 allele (i.e., AS ≥ 1), variability in Clint appeared to be due to variability in Vmax, which correlates to CYP2D6 activity. In vitro (Stevens et al., 2008) and longitudinal phenotyping (Blake et al., 2007) studies demonstrated that beyond the first week or two of life, age is not a significant determinant of variability in CYP2D6 activity. However, investigations of the regulation of CYP2D6 gene expression have revealed that a long-range single nucleotide polymorphism can influence the expression of CYP2D6 through enhancement of gene transcription (Wang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015). Expanding genotyping panels to include this single nucleotide polymorphism could potentially aid to improve prediction of ATX exposure. Data on additional factors impacting CYP2D6 transcription are sparse, although farnesoid X receptor (FXR) transactivation of small heterodimer partner has been demonstrated to play a role in CYP2D6 regulation (Pan et al., 2015). FXR acts as a bile acid sensor, and high levels of ligand promote transactivation of small heterodimer partner, which reduces expression of proteins involved in bile acid synthesis. CYP2D6 gene expression also appears to be reduced with bile acid binding of FXR (Pan et al., 2015; Pan and Jeong, 2015). Finally, there has been recent interest in the role that variability in cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase may have on interindividual variability in CYP-mediated oxidative biotransformation reactions. Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase variant proteins affected the turnover of three different CYP2D6 substrates, with essentially no effect on Km, but the effects on Vmax ranged from an inability to support catalytic activity (R457H) to a four- to sixfold range in Vmax values, depending on the individual substrate (Sandee et al., 2010). Additional work is required to determine the relative contribution of these factors to observed variability in ATX clearance in vitro and in vivo.

The second contribution provided by this investigation is the identification of the CYP isoforms responsible for 4-OH-ATX formation in livers with lower CYP2D6 activity. Km and Vmax determined from 4-OH-ATX formation in livers with an AS scores of 0 and 0.5 had increased Km and decreased Vmax values. Different CYP isoforms are likely responsible for the Michaelis-Menten profile for 4-OH-ATX formation, as previously published (Sauer et al., 2003). Heterologously expressed enzyme CYP2J2 was the only CYP, other than CYP2D6, to form 4-OH-ATX, albeit with rates 100-fold lower than CYP2D6. Hepatic abundance of CYP2J2 is low, but its importance may be relevant in individuals who have low CYP2D6 activity, as with the anti-viral drug ritonavir (Kaspera et al., 2014). Studies using specific chemical inhibitors of CYPs in the HLM sample genotyped as an intermediate metabolizer (AS = 0.5) found that CYP2D6 and CYP2E1 were the major isoforms involved in 4-OH-ATX formation. CYP2E1 metabolism of ATX is unusual, given that the drug is larger than a prototypical CYP2E1 substrate (<100 g/mol) (Sridhar et al., 2012). The sum percent inhibition of 4-OH-ATX between CYP2D6 and CYP2E1 is greater than 100%, suggesting loss of specificity with quinidine or 4-methylpyrazole. Specific chemical inhibition is not well studied for CYP2E1 (Khojasteh et al., 2011). Linear regression analysis evaluating the association between CYP2E1 activity (chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation), and Clint was analyzed to further elucidate this relationship. A statistically significant association was noted (r2 = 0.46, p = 0.042). Visual examination of this analysis found what appears to be a biased outlier. Removal of this observation resulted in a nonsignificant association (r2 = 0.36, p = 0.12). Additionally, recombinant CYP2E1 did not form 4-OH-ATX. In the CYP2D6 PM (AS = 0) HLM, inhibition studies suggested a role for CYP3A in the 4-hydroxylation of ATX, which was apparent with higher concentrations of ATX and increased incubation time.

This is the first investigation to examine 2-CH2OH-ATX formation. Heterologously expressed CYP2B6 formed this metabolite to the greatest extent, followed by CYP2D6. Inhibition studies in HLMs with low CYP2D6 AS confirmed the role for CYP2B6 and also implicated CYP2A6 in formation of 2-CH2OH-ATX. Cumulatively, in the absence of CYP2D6, it appears that CYPs 2B6, 2C18, 2C19, 2E1, 2J2, and 3A4 are the primary pathways contributing to hepatic ATX biotransformation. Thus factors contributing to variability in the activity of these pathways in children—ontogeny and genetic variation—could cause interindividual variability in ATX disposition in children with reduced CYP2D6 activity. Although the exact percent contribution of these pathways cannot be calculated at this time, the data from the pediatric HLM screen suggests that the competing pathways can contribute to ∼98% of ATX metabolism on average in PM livers. In non-PM livers the contribution of competing pathways decreases to 33%. On average, we found that 4-OH-ATX was the most abundant metabolite, followed by 2-CH2OH-ATX, and NDM-ATX. However, these values are tentative considering that the study design was optimized for CYP2D6-mediated 4-OH-ATX formation, i.e., we did not have a standard to measure 2-CH2OH-ATX metabolite formation.

The third issue addressed in our study was characterization of the relative contributions of age and genotype in each of the three primary pathways of ATX biotransformation. As expected, CYP2D6 genotype had a major impact on 4-OH-ATX formation rate. Age had no effect on 4-OH-ATX formation. Neither age nor genetic variants of CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 appeared to affect formation rates of NDM-ATX and 2-CH2OH-ATX metabolites. Changes in expression and activity of enzymes, due to ontogeny or genetic variation, involved in competing pathways would not be captured if an individual liver also had high CYP2D6 activity. However, multiple CYP isoforms can form NDM-ATX and 2-CH2OH-ATX, and there was not a high differential in the rates of formation for the metabolites among CYP isoforms studied. This may cause genotype or ontogeny effects to be dampened. The reason why CYP2D6 differs is because the formation rate of 4-OH-ATX was at least 100-fold higher compared with other isoforms. It is likely that differences in ontogeny and genetic variation in competing pathways will be more apparent in individuals who have low CYP2D6 activity.

This investigation guides future directions of research needed to build tools to individualize ATX use in a pediatric population. Although we confirmed that ATX metabolism and Clint is primarily associated with CYP2D6 genotype and phenotype, substantial variability is still unexplained, which is tied to a partial understanding of factors that influence CYP2D6 activity. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of CYP2D6 gene regulation and CYP2D6 activity modulation are important for understanding ATX pharmacokinetics in this population. Incorporating genetic and ontogeny information of these factors may enhance the ability to predict CYP2D6 in vivo activity and hence also result in improved ability to predict drug-exposure relationships for an individual child. Accurately predicting CYP2D6 activity would also allow for proper weighting of other CYPs involved in ATX metabolism. Differences in CYP2E1, CYP2J2, and CYP3A enzymatic activities will particularly influence clearance through the 4-OH-ATX pathway for individuals with low CYP2D6 activity. The importance to ATX clearance is only relative with decreasing CYP2D6 activity. To build a comprehensive PBPK model of ATX, the nuances of ATX metabolism in genetic variation and ontogeny must be weighted as function of CYP2D6 activity that takes into account data from genotype, factors that affect transcription and translation, and variability of accessory proteins. The increased percent contribution of competing pathways with decreasing CYP2D6 activity (i.e., AS = 0–0.5) must also be considered. Variability in NDM-ATX and 2-CH2OH-ATX formation becomes influential when formation of these metabolites are rate limiting steps to overall ATX clearance. Both ontogeny and genetic polymorphisms have the potential to affect these minor routes of metabolism. As such, for certain CYPs, further investigation of ontogenic trajectory and/or genetic variability is needed for an accurate bottom-up model. In summary, a comprehensive PBPK model that can be used to predict individual ATX clearances must include a priori knowledge of factors that influence CYP2D6 activity that can then be weighted against the contribution and variability of competing CYP isoforms.

Supplementary Material

Data Supplement

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kim T. Gibson for technical expertise.

Abbreviations

ADHD

attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

ANOVA

analysis of variance

AS

activity score

ATX

atomoxetine

AUC

area under the curve

EM

extensive metabolizer

4-OH-ATX

4-hydroxyatomoxetine

FXR

farnesoid X receptor

HLM

human liver microsomes

IM

intermediate metabolizer

NDM-ATX

N-desmethylatomoxetine

PBPK

physiologically based pharmacokinetic

PM

poor metabolizer

2-CH2OH-ATX

2-hydroxymethylatomoxetine

UPLC-MS/MS

ultra performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry

XL

long-range

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: Dinh, Pearce, Van Haandel, Gaedigk, Leeder.

Conducted experiments: Dinh, Pearce, Van Haandel, and Gaedigk.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Dinh, Pearce, Van Haandel, Gaedigk, and Leeder.

Footnotes

The Liver Tissue Cell Distribution System is funded by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [Contract #N01-DK-7-0004/HHSN267200700004C]. The project entitled, “Laboratory of Developmental Biology” is supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [Award #5R24HD0008836]. The content does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health.

Inline graphicThis article has supplemental material available at dmd.aspetjournals.org.

References

  1. Asherson P, Akehurst R, Kooij JJ, Huss M, Beusterien K, Sasané R, Gholizadeh S, Hodgkins P. (2012) Under diagnosis of adult ADHD: cultural influences and societal burden. J Atten Disord 16(5, Suppl)20S–38S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blake MJ, Gaedigk A, Pearce RE, Bomgaars LR, Christensen ML, Stowe C, James LP, Wilson JT, Kearns GL, Leeder JS. (2007) Ontogeny of dextromethorphan O- and N-demethylation in the first year of life. Clin Pharmacol Ther 81:510–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown JT, Abdel-Rahman SM, van Haandel L, Gaedigk A, Lin YS, Leeder JS. (2015) Single dose, CYP2D6 genotype-stratified pharmacokinetic study of atomoxetine in children with ADHD. Clin Pharmacol Ther 10.1002/cpt. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chai G, Governale L, McMahon AW, Trinidad JP, Staffa J, Murphy D. (2012) Trends of outpatient prescription drug utilization in US children, 2002-2010. Pediatrics 130:23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cui YM, Teng CH, Pan AX, Yuen E, Yeo KP, Zhou Y, Zhao X, Long AJ, Bangs ME, Wise SD. (2007) Atomoxetine pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects and effect of the CYP2D6*10 allele. Br J Clin Pharmacol 64:445–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldman HM, Reiff MI. (2014) Clinical practice. Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 370:838–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaedigk A, Bhathena A, Ndjountché L, Pearce RE, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Bradford LD, Rogan PK, Leeder JS. (2005) Identification and characterization of novel sequence variations in the cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) gene in African Americans. Pharmacogenomics J 5:173–182. Corrigendum Pharmacogenomics J (2005) 5 276. 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaedigk A, Bradford LD, Alander SW, Leeder JS. (2006) CYP2D6*36 gene arrangements within the cyp2d6 locus: association of CYP2D6*36 with poor metabolizer status. Drug Metab Dispos 34:563–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaedigk A, Fuhr U, Johnson C, Bérard LA, Bradford D, Leeder JS. (2010a) CYP2D7-2D6 hybrid tandems: identification of novel CYP2D6 duplication arrangements and implications for phenotype prediction. Pharmacogenomics 11:43–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaedigk A, Jaime LK, Bertino JS, Jr, Bérard A, Pratt VM, Bradfordand LD, Leeder JS. (2010b) Identification of novel CYP2D7-2D6 hybrids: non-functional and functional variants. Front Pharmacol 1:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaedigk A, Ndjountché L, Divakaran K, Dianne Bradford L, Zineh I, Oberlander TF, Brousseau DC, McCarver DG, Johnson JA, Alander SW, et al. (2007) Cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) gene locus heterogeneity: characterization of gene duplication events. Clin Pharmacol Ther 81:242–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaedigk A, Simon SD, Pearce RE, Bradford LD, Kennedy MJ, Leeder JS. (2008) The CYP2D6 activity score: translating genotype information into a qualitative measure of phenotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:234–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaedigk A, Twist GP, Leeder JS. (2012) CYP2D6, SULT1A1 and UGT2B17 copy number variation: quantitative detection by multiplex PCR. Pharmacogenomics 13:91–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaspera R, Kirby BJ, Sahele T, Collier AC, Kharasch ED, Unadkat JD, Totah RA. (2014) Investigating the contribution of CYP2J2 to ritonavir metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol 91:109–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khojasteh SC, Prabhu S, Kenny JR, Halladay JS, Lu AY. (2011) Chemical inhibitors of cytochrome P450 isoforms in human liver microsomes: a re-evaluation of P450 isoform selectivity. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 36:1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kratochvil CJ, Michelson D, Newcorn JH, Weiss MD, Busner J, Moore RJ, Ruff DD, Ramsey J, Dickson R, Turgay A, et al. (2007) High-dose atomoxetine treatment of ADHD in youths with limited response to standard doses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:1128–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Läpple F, von Richter O, Fromm MF, Richter T, Thon KP, Wisser H, Griese EU, Eichelbaum M, Kivistö KT. (2003) Differential expression and function of CYP2C isoforms in human intestine and liver. Pharmacogenetics 13:565–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matsui A, Azuma J, Witcher JW, Long AJ, Sauer JM, Smith BP, DeSante KA, Read HA, Takahashi M, Nakano M. (2012) Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of atomoxetine and effect of CYP2D6*10/*10 genotype in healthy Japanese men. J Clin Pharmacol 52:388–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mattiuz EL, Ponsler GD, Barbuch RJ, Wood PG, Mullen JH, Shugert RL, Li Q, Wheeler WJ, Kuo F, Conrad PC, et al. (2003) Disposition and metabolic fate of atomoxetine hydrochloride: pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion in the Fischer 344 rat and beagle dog. Drug Metab Dispos 31:88–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Michelson D, Read HA, Ruff DD, Witcher J, Zhang S, McCracken J. (2007) CYP2D6 and clinical response to atomoxetine in children and adolescents with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:242–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Newcorn JH, Sutton VK, Weiss MD, Sumner CR. (2009) Clinical responses to atomoxetine in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Integrated Data Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:511–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Norman G. (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15:625–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pan X, Jeong H. (2015) Estrogen-induced cholestasis leads to repressed CYP2D6 expression in CYP2D6-humanized mice. Mol Pharmacol 88:106–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan X, Lee YK, Jeong H. (2015) Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist Represses Cytochrome P450 2D6 Expression by Upregulating Small Heterodimer Partner. Drug Metab Dispos 43:1002–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pearce RE, Gaedigk R, Twist GP, Dai H, Riffel AK, Leeder JS, Gaedigk A. (2015) Developmental expression of CYP2B6: a comprehensive analysis of mRNA expression, protein content and bupropion hydroxylase activity and the impact of genetic variation. Drug Metab Dispos dmd.115.067546, in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ring BJ, Gillespie JS, Eckstein JA, Wrighton SA. (2002) Identification of the human cytochromes P450 responsible for atomoxetine metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 30:319–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sandee D, Morrissey K, Agrawal V, Tam HK, Kramer MA, Tracy TS, Giacomini KM, Miller WL. (2010) Effects of genetic variants of human P450 oxidoreductase on catalysis by CYP2D6 in vitro. Pharmacogenet Genomics 20:677–686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sauer JM, Ponsler GD, Mattiuz EL, Long AJ, Witcher JW, Thomasson HR, Desante KA. (2003) Disposition and metabolic fate of atomoxetine hydrochloride: the role of CYP2D6 in human disposition and metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 31:98–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sauer JM, Ring BJ, Witcher JW. (2005) Clinical pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:571–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Savill NC, Buitelaar JK, Anand E, Day KA, Treuer T, Upadhyaya HP, Coghill D. (2015) The efficacy of atomoxetine for the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comprehensive review of over a decade of clinical research. CNS Drugs 29:131–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sridhar J, Liu J, Foroozesh M, Stevens CL. (2012) Insights on cytochrome p450 enzymes and inhibitors obtained through QSAR studies. Molecules 17:9283–9305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stephens M, Donnelly P. (2003) A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1162–1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68:978–989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stevens JC, Marsh SA, Zaya MJ, Regina KJ, Divakaran K, Le M, Hines RN. (2008) Developmental changes in human liver CYP2D6 expression. Drug Metab Dispos 36:1587–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Trzepacz PT, Williams DW, Feldman PD, Wrishko RE, Witcher JW, Buitelaar JK. (2008) CYP2D6 metabolizer status and atomoxetine dosing in children and adolescents with ADHD. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 18:79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang D, Papp AC, Sun X. (2015) Functional characterization of CYP2D6 enhancer polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet 24:1556–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang D, Poi MJ, Sun X, Gaedigk A, Leeder JS, Sadee W. (2014) Common CYP2D6 polymorphisms affecting alternative splicing and transcription: long-range haplotypes with two regulatory variants modulate CYP2D6 activity. Hum Mol Genet 23:268–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Witcher JW, Long A, Smith B, Sauer JM, Heilgenstein J, Wilens T, Spencer T, Biederman J. (2003) Atomoxetine pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 13:53–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Supplement

Articles from Drug Metabolism and Disposition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

RESOURCES