Table 6.

Percentages of read posts that were judged as relevant for the most important types of health information.

Type of health information	For their own health issue	For other’s health issue	With no particular issue	ANOVAa P value	Post hoc P 1,2	Post hoc P 1,3	Post hoc P 2,3
B1 SYM symptom	74.5%	32.2%	11.2%	.001	0	.001	0
B3 HST history	72.3%	21.4%	5.6%	.001	0	0	.001
E2 DIS description	69.1%	31.6%	7.1%	.02	.01	.01	0
E1 RSN cause	16.5%	67.2%	9.4%	.01	.01	0	0
E3 TRM terms	6.5%	21.3%	4.5%	.023	.01	.44	.02
G2 PRO procedure	14.4%	53.2%	2.5%	.001	0	0	.001
H2 AWP pollution	4.5%	15.3%	55.9%	.02	.02	0	0
H3 SMO smoking	6.4%	4.5%	45.2%	.21	.67	0	0
I1 RAR rare issue	2.1%	7.5%	42.1%	.001	.001	0	0

^aANOVA: analysis of variance.