Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 28;6(2):16. doi: 10.3390/jpm6020016

Table 3.

Overview of barriers and facilitators to adoption of genomic services for colorectal cancer care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Domain Genomic Service Implication
Family Health History (FHH) Documentation Clinical Testing (Molecular and Genetic) Genetic Counseling
Structural +/−
FHH routinely collected; however, lack of policy to standardize collection according to guidelines
(incentives and mandates 1)

Limited use and, for some, unclear referral process due to perceived low disease burden (innovation-system fit 1)
+/−
GMS has facilitated referral process for genetic counseling; however, limited access presently (inter-organizational networks 1)

Structural barriers are lack of mandates for guideline adherent FHH documentation, perceived low need for testing in VHA patient population, and limited availability of in-house genetic counseling service; national VHA LS policy could improve adherence to guidelines via mandates for systematic FHH documentation, clinical testing protocol, and genetic counseling access.
Individual +/−
Gastroenterologists and oncologists likely to consider FHH documentation for CRC; however, when documented, completed with limited detail (attitudes 2)
+/−
Across specialties, clinician use of testing facilitated by individual awareness/interest and local champion, and negatively impacted by lack thereof
(attitudes 2; resources 2,3)
+
Resources facilitative because variability in individual expertise (attitudes 2; resources 2,3)

Individual-level barriers for FHH and clinical testing are low knowledge of or interest in LS, particularly by non-specialists; development of clinician education, local clinical champions, and genetic counseling resources could increase knowledge of evidence-based processes and ways to access services.
Innovational
Lack of template/tool to facilitate guideline-informed use of FHH (augmentation/support 1)
+
Perceived advantage of molecular testing as more reliable 1st step than FHH
(relative advantage 1)
+
“Expert” genomics support appreciated, such as provided by academic affiliate or within VA by local navigators, other VA facilities, or centralized GMS
(augmentation/Support 1)

Availability of a tool (or template) could facilitate adherence to guidelines for documenting FHH. Clinical testing regarded as advantageous, indicating potential for wider uptake. Access to expert support is essential.

+ = facilitator; − = barrier; GMS = VHA Genomic Medicine Service; FHH = family health history; LS = Lynch Syndrome; EMR = electronic medical record; 1 Greenhalgh (2004, [14]); 2 Bradley (2002, [13]); 3 Phillips (1998, [15]).