Table 7.

Binary logistic regression models for predicting high^a anxiety

		Unadjusted	95 % CI			Adjusted	95 % CI
	p-value	OR	Lower	Upper	p-value	OR	Lower	Upper
Gender identity	.15	1.95	0.79	4.86	.17	1.96	0.74	5.18
Age	.01	0.51	0.31	0.84	.23	0.69	0.37	1.27
Education	.49	0.89	0.65	1.23	.24	1.25	0.86	1.82
Income	<.001	0.74	0.63	0.86	.001	0.73	0.61	0.88
Relationship	.79	1.10	0.54	2.26	.25	1.57	0.73	3.38
Homelessness	1.00	1.00	0.52	1.92	.82	0.92	0.46	1.83
Children	.06	0.51	0.25	1.03	.52	0.78	0.36	1.67
Sexual orientation	.05	1.41	1.00	2.00	.23	1.24	0.87	1.75
Age	.01	0.51	0.31	0.84	.29	0.72	0.39	1.33
Education	.49	0.89	0.65	1.23	.25	1.24	0.86	1.80
Income	<.001	0.74	0.63	0.86	.001	0.74	0.62	0.89
Relationship	.79	1.10	0.54	2.26	.23	1.60	0.74	3.45
Children	.06	0.51	0.25	1.03	.49	0.76	0.36	1.64

Note: ^aScore of 8 or more on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Anxiety Subscale