Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004426 e004426. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004426

Table 2.

Association of logPWV with LV structural and functional variables

Response R2 Model1 Model2 Model3
LVEDVi, ml/m1.7 0.22 −0.75 (−1.22 to −0.28)* −0.08 (−0.54 to .39)
LVESVi, ml/m1.7 0.19 0.27 (−0.01 to 0.55) 0.46 (0.18 to 0.74)*
LVMi, g/m1.7 0.46 0.92 (0.41 to 1.42)* 0.53 (0.12 to 0.95)
LVMVR, g/ml 0.24 0.039 (0.030 to 0.049)** 0.015 (0.006 to 0.025)*
LVEF, % 0.23 −0.93 (−1.24 to −0.61)** −0.84 (−1.16 to −0.52)** −0.86 (−1.17 to −0.55)**
Ecc, % 0.25 0.69 (0.55 to 0.83)** 0.55 (0.40 to 0.69)** 0.48 (0.34 to 0.63)**
Torsion, °/cm 0.27 −0.07 (0.12 to −0.01) −0.11 (−0.17 to −0.06)** −0.11 (−0.16 to −0.06)**
EDSR, 1/s 0.12 −0.007 (−0.009 to −0.005)** −0.003 (−0.005 to −0.001) −0.002 (0.005 to 0.0002)

Coefficients and 95%CI (in brackets) were estimated using multivariable linear regression models to assess the association of logPWV (per 1 SD) with LV structural and functional variables as dependent variables.

Model 1: unadjusted.

Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race, smoking, diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive medication, obesity, SBP, heart rate, LDL, HDL, and CVD

Model 3: adjusted for Model2 + LVMi and LVEDVi

CVD indicates cardiovascular disease; other abbreviation as in Table 1.

**

if p<0.001,

*

if p<0.01,

if p<0.05