Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2015 Feb;7(1):63–94. doi: 10.1257/pol.20120325

Table 3.

Effects of Foreclosures by Zip Code

Non-Elective Preventable Cancer Heart Mental Respiratory Infection
Zip Code Level, N=56,088, Mean Population in a Zip Code=19,750

Foreclosure Rates (t-1) 1.4996***
(0.1378)
0.1347***
(0.0137)
0.0064***
(0.0017)
0.1136***
(0.0118)
0.0651***
(0.0076)
0.2252***
(0.0539)
Number Visits per 100k per Quarter 10580 972 85 935 438 1385

Model with Four Lags, N=46,740

Foreclosures Rates (t-1) 0.6309***
(0.1910)
0.0714***
(0.0097)
−0.0002
(0.0027)
0.0459***
(0.0168)
0.0293***
(0.0082)
0.0932**
(0.0441)
Foreclosures Rates (t-2) 0.5200***
(0.1393)
0.0637***
(0.0085)
0.0066
(0.0080)
0.0387***
(0.0084)
0.0027
(0.0079)
0.2062***
(0.0621)
Foreclosures Rates (t-3) 0.0340
(0.1609)
−0.0180**
(0.0082)
−0.0034***
(0.0012)
0.0005
(0.0059)
0.0139***
(0.0048)
−0.0846
(0.0679)
Foreclosures Rates (t-4) −0.4019
(0.5145)
−0.0265
(0.0257)
0.0004
(0.0052)
0.0059
(0.0104)
0.0135**
(0.0058)
−0.1935
(0.2188)
Sum of lags 0.7830 0.0906 0.0034 0.0909 0.0594 0.0213
P value for all lags=0 0.0826 0.0009 0.3332 0.0000 0.0000 0.9224
# Visits per 100k per Year 42817 3911 334 3764 1794 5581

Notes: Regressions of hospitalization plus ER rates on foreclosure rates also included zip code fixed, effects, county*quarter*year effects and time trends for clusters of zip codes. Standard errors in parentheses. ***, **, and * indicate that the estimate is statistically significant at the 99th, 95th, and 90th percent level of confidence. Bold face indicates that the sum of lags is significantly different than zero.