Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;30(11):1817–1827. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001125

Table 2.

Validation of the model for predicting future suppression by 6 months since start of treatment given observations up to a specified visit.

2-month visit 3-month visit 4-month visit
Number patientsa 1927 1127 698
Observed suppressed 81% 69% 51%
Predicted suppressed 80% 67% 51%
Sensitivity [95% CI] 86% [84%, 88%] 81% [79%, 84%] 80% [76%, 85%]
Specificity [95% CI] 46% [41%, 51%] 63% [58%, 68%] 79% [75%, 83%]
PPV [95% CI] 87% [85%, 89%] 83% [80%, 86%] 80% [76%, 84%]
NPV [95% CI] 44% [39%, 49%] 60% [55%, 65%] 79% [75%, 84%]
LR+ [95% CI] 1.60 [1.45, 1.76] 2.21 [1.92, 2.55] 3.86 [3.12, 4.78]
LR− [95% CI] 0.30 [0.26, 0.36] 0.30 [0.25, 0.35] 0.25 [0.20, 0.31]
DOR [95% CI] 5.25 [4.09, 6.74] 7.49 [5.65, 9.93] 15.60 [10.77, 22.56]

aNumber of patients not suppressed at the specified visit and with at least one future measurement.

CI, confidence interval; DOR, diagnostic odds-ratio; LR−, likelihood ratio of a negative result; LR+, likelihood ratio of a positive result; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.