Table 2.
Validation of the model for predicting future suppression by 6 months since start of treatment given observations up to a specified visit.
| 2-month visit | 3-month visit | 4-month visit | |
| Number patientsa | 1927 | 1127 | 698 |
| Observed suppressed | 81% | 69% | 51% |
| Predicted suppressed | 80% | 67% | 51% |
| Sensitivity [95% CI] | 86% [84%, 88%] | 81% [79%, 84%] | 80% [76%, 85%] |
| Specificity [95% CI] | 46% [41%, 51%] | 63% [58%, 68%] | 79% [75%, 83%] |
| PPV [95% CI] | 87% [85%, 89%] | 83% [80%, 86%] | 80% [76%, 84%] |
| NPV [95% CI] | 44% [39%, 49%] | 60% [55%, 65%] | 79% [75%, 84%] |
| LR+ [95% CI] | 1.60 [1.45, 1.76] | 2.21 [1.92, 2.55] | 3.86 [3.12, 4.78] |
| LR− [95% CI] | 0.30 [0.26, 0.36] | 0.30 [0.25, 0.35] | 0.25 [0.20, 0.31] |
| DOR [95% CI] | 5.25 [4.09, 6.74] | 7.49 [5.65, 9.93] | 15.60 [10.77, 22.56] |
aNumber of patients not suppressed at the specified visit and with at least one future measurement.
CI, confidence interval; DOR, diagnostic odds-ratio; LR−, likelihood ratio of a negative result; LR+, likelihood ratio of a positive result; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.