Table 5.
The effect of CK on lipid profiles in mice
| Groups | ND | HD | SS | CKB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (mg/dl) | ||||
| TG | 122.61 ± 21.25 | 124.15 ± 14.94 | 112.78 ± 12.08 | 122.58 ± 21.50 |
| TC | 112.15 ± 9.80c | 146.08 ± 22.60a | 132.29 ± 19.85a,b | 128.61 ± 13.22b |
| HDL-c | 89.40 ± 16.26b | 108.85 ± 16.13a | 85.41 ± 22.65b | 90.05 ± 15.70b |
| HDL-c/TC (%) | 80.77 ± 12.30 | 76.23 ± 14.69 | 64.93 ± 16.80 | 72.18 ± 5.94 |
| Liver (mg/g) | ||||
| TG | 9.28 ± 1.71b | 11.91 ± 1.59a | 10.17 ± 2.17a,b | 10.75 ± 1.67a,b |
| TC | 3.78 ± 0.70a,b | 4.39 ± 0.83a | 3.22 ± 0.96b | 3.30 ± 0.99b |
All values are mean ± SD. Values with different letters are significantly different by ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test at p<0.05. ND, AIN-93 modified diet with 10% kcal from fat; HD, AIN-93 modified high fat diet with 60% kcal from fat; SS, high fat diet plus 30% unfermented soybean; CKB, high fat diet plus 30% CK fermented with B. licheniformis-67.