Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;74:30. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0140-1

Table 3.

Number of food items and portion size reported by each study within the Bladder cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants study (BLEND)

 Study Food items (n) Portion size
Case–control studies
 Los-Angeles bladder cancer Case–control study [10] 49 Yes
 Roswell Park Cancer Institute [11] 44 Yes
 Belgian Case–control study on bladder cancer [12] 788 Yes
 Aichi Prefecture Case–control study [13] 107 Yes
 Kaohsiung [14] 41 Yes
 Hessen Case–control study on bladder cancer [15] 26 No
 Stockholm Case–control study [16] 188 Yes
 Roswell Park Memorial Institute Case–control study on bladder cancer [17] 64 Yes
 Reina Sofia University [18] 17 No
 New Hampshire bladder cancer study [19] 121 Yes
 Italian Case–control study on bladder cancer [20] 21 No
 Brescia bladder cancer study [21] 40 Yes
 Dortmund Hörde study [22] 3 Yes
 National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System (NESCC) [23] 69 Yes
 French INSERM study [24] 2 No
 South and East China Case–control study on bladder and prostate cancer [25] 52 No
 Molecular Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer and Prostate Cancer [26] 90 Yes
 North Carolina case control study [27] 9 No
Cohort studies
 Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC) & the Cohort of Swedish Men [28] 96 No
 Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer, the Netherlands, 1986–2003 [29] 150 Yes
 Women’s Lifestyle and Health Study [30] 98 Yes
 RERF atomic bomb survivors Study [31] 102 No
 Vital study [32] 126 Yes
 European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) [33, 34] 260a Yes

aDietary intake was assessed by a number of different instruments in the participating countries and the number of different food items varied from 88 (Norway) to 2443 (Sweden)