Table 3.
Number of food items and portion size reported by each study within the Bladder cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants study (BLEND)
Study | Food items (n) | Portion size |
---|---|---|
Case–control studies | ||
Los-Angeles bladder cancer Case–control study [10] | 49 | Yes |
Roswell Park Cancer Institute [11] | 44 | Yes |
Belgian Case–control study on bladder cancer [12] | 788 | Yes |
Aichi Prefecture Case–control study [13] | 107 | Yes |
Kaohsiung [14] | 41 | Yes |
Hessen Case–control study on bladder cancer [15] | 26 | No |
Stockholm Case–control study [16] | 188 | Yes |
Roswell Park Memorial Institute Case–control study on bladder cancer [17] | 64 | Yes |
Reina Sofia University [18] | 17 | No |
New Hampshire bladder cancer study [19] | 121 | Yes |
Italian Case–control study on bladder cancer [20] | 21 | No |
Brescia bladder cancer study [21] | 40 | Yes |
Dortmund Hörde study [22] | 3 | Yes |
National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System (NESCC) [23] | 69 | Yes |
French INSERM study [24] | 2 | No |
South and East China Case–control study on bladder and prostate cancer [25] | 52 | No |
Molecular Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer and Prostate Cancer [26] | 90 | Yes |
North Carolina case control study [27] | 9 | No |
Cohort studies | ||
Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC) & the Cohort of Swedish Men [28] | 96 | No |
Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer, the Netherlands, 1986–2003 [29] | 150 | Yes |
Women’s Lifestyle and Health Study [30] | 98 | Yes |
RERF atomic bomb survivors Study [31] | 102 | No |
Vital study [32] | 126 | Yes |
European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) [33, 34] | 260a | Yes |
aDietary intake was assessed by a number of different instruments in the participating countries and the number of different food items varied from 88 (Norway) to 2443 (Sweden)