Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jan 25;103(Suppl 1):S23–S32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.006

Table 2.

Results of random intercepts models for use of evidence-based practices.

Coefficient S.E. t
Level 1 fixed effects
 Goals of corrections (n = 257)
  Rehabilitation 0.30 0.14 2.10*
  Punishment −0.36 0.11 −3.23**
  Importance of corrections-based substance abuse treatment 0.06 0.03 1.87
  Importance of community-based substance abuse treatment 0.02 0.03 0.62
 Organizational culture and climate (n = 225)a
  Management emphasis on quality treatment 0.37 0.16 2.35*
  Performance/Achievement 0.08 0.10 0.77
  Innovation/Adaptability 0.04 0.12 0.33
 Training and resources (n = 412)
  Training 0.30 0.07 4.06***
  Funding 0.01 0.07 0.08
  Physical plant −0.08 0.17 −0.52
  Resources −0.03 0.19 −0.15
  Staffing −0.10 0.06 −1.59
  Internal support 0.37 0.09 4.32***
Level 2 fixed effects
 Goals of corrections (n = 73)
  Rehabilitation −0.01 0.10 −0.08
  Deterrence 0.05 0.08 0.61
  Importance of corrections-based SA Tx <0.01 0.04 0.04
  Importance of community-based SA Tx 0.18 0.05 3.70***
 Organizational culture and climate (n = 62)a
  Management emphasis on quality treatment 0.15 0.14 1.07
  Cohesion 0.34 0.17 1.94*
  Hierarchy 0.08 0.17 0.44
  Performance/Achievement −0.14 0.16 −0.92
  Innovation/Adaptability −0.22 0.16 −1.56
 Resources (n = 91)
  Training 0.22 0.06 3.47**
  Funding −0.16 0.09 −1.69
  Physical Plant <0.01 0.17 0.02
  Resources −0.18 0.18 −0.98
  Staffing 0.02 0.12 0.17
Systems integration (n = 90)
 Shared activities with Substance abuse treatment programs −0.01 0.02 −0.61
 Shared activities with probation and parole agencies 0.05 0.02 3.14**
 Shared activities with judiciary 0.02 0.03 0.60
 Level of involvement with criminal justice agencies 0.24 0.08 2.82**
 Level of involvement with non-criminal justice agencies 0.02 0.12 0.17
 Direct contact between executive and SA Tx staff 0.03 0.02 2.11*
 Direct contact between executive and general staff −0.03 0.02 −1.67
 Direct contact between executive and health service staff/medical director 0.02 0.03 0.69
 Direct Contact between executive and SA Tx director 0.01 0.02 0.27
 Direct contact between executive and mental health services director −0.01 0.03 −0.36
 Level of contact between executive and health programs staff 0.07 0.08 0.80
 Level of contact between executive and other programs staff 0.06 0.09 0.72

Note. SE: Standard Error, SA Tx: Substance Abuse Treatment. All models control for whether the respondent oversees adult or juvenile corrections organizations. Random effects are presented separately for each domain, Missions and Goals, Resources, Culture and Climate, and Systems Integration. Results of variance components not presented here to conserve space. They are available from the first author by request.

a

The number of respondents is lower for the Culture and Climate domain because the treatment directors did not complete these measures.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.