Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;10:309. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00309

Table 1.

Results of the comparison between recorded undirected songs and model songs for all 15 birds.

Bird Model R (random sequence) Model C (consistent sequence)
Deviation p < 0.05 Deviation p < 0.05 Deviation p < 0.05 Deviation p < 0.05
bird < model model < bird bird < model model < bird
2994 100 100 0 0 95 73 5 0
3534 98 70 2 0 98 50 2 0
4042 100 100 0 0 93 82 7 0
4052 100 100 0 0 84 66 16 0
4217 100 100 0 0 100 98 0 0
4295 100 100 0 0 77 57 23 11
4306 100 100 0 0 98 86 2 2
4344 100 60 0 0 95 50 5 0
4427 100 100 0 0 82 50 18 2
4462 100 100 0 0 77 43 23 7
4502 84 0 16 0 59 5 41 0
4523 100 98 0 0 98 77 2 0
4635 100 100 0 0 66 39 34 14
4669 100 94 0 0 70 39 30 9
g13r8 100 100 0 0 18 9 82 70
Mean: 99 88 1 0 81 55 19 8

Artificial song creation was repeated 50 times for each song chunk with different pseudorandom values for each repetition. Values are the percent of repetitions in which the pulseS deviation (FRMSD) was lower in natural songs compared to model songs and vice versa (first and third column in each block) and the percentage in which this difference was statistically significant (LMM; p < 0.05; second and fourth column in each block). Column mean is given at the bottom.