Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015 Nov 25;7(1):100–108. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00246

Table 2.

Summary of alcohol effects on EC20 GABA responses of mutant ρ1 receptors. Symbols: , potentiation; , inhibition; , no effect. Numbers indicate the percent change of the EC20 GABA responses in the presence of alcohol (+, potentiation; −, inhibition). The colored text corresponds to the color of the amino acids in the model representations; WT, wild-type. The values for ethanol and hexanol effects correspond to the average of all WT receptors in each group. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001, ****p< 0.000 1 versus WT expressed in oocytes from the same batch as each mutant, as shown in the figures. Analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test.

Receptor Ethanol n Hexanol n
ρ1 WT Inline graphic
−42 ± 1 %
26 Inline graphic
−27 ± 3 %
21
ρ1(T6’Y) Inline graphic
12 ± 2 % ****
7 Inline graphic
4 ± 1 % ****
4
ρ1(T6’F) Inline graphic
14 ± 4 % ****
6 Inline graphic
13 ± 5 % ***
6
ρ1(T6’V) Inline graphic
−61 ± 2 % ****
6 Inline graphic
−96 ± 1 % ****
6
ρ1(T6’M) Inline graphic
−35 ± 2 %
4 Inline graphic
−39 ± 1 % *
6
ρ1 WT Inline graphic
−43 ± 1 %
19 Inline graphic
−22 ± 2 %
18
ρ1(I5’A) Inline graphic
−38 ± 3 %
7 Inline graphic
−33 ± 1 % ****
7
ρ1(I5’V) Inline graphic
−50 ± 4 %
4 Inline graphic
−36 ± 1 %
4
ρ1(I5’F) Inline graphic
−40 ± 3 %
4 Inline graphic
−37 ± 2 % **
4
ρ1(I5’W) Inline graphic
−57 ± 2 % **
5 Inline graphic
−52 ± 2 % ****
5