(Hoffman et al., 2005) [63] |
8 individuals with NSCLBP (4 male, 4 female) |
25 min of cycle ergometry. 5 min at 50% peak oxygen uptake, then 20 min at 70% peak oxygen uptake |
Pressure pain test. Pain significantly decreased by 28% at 2 min and 22% at 32 min post exercise compared to pre-exercise values. No gender/age differences in results |
p < 0.05 |
(Shnayderman & Katz-Leurer, 2013) [16] |
52 sedentary NSCLBP patients aged 18-65 years |
Experimental group (walking on treadmill at 50% heart rate reserve). Control group: specific low back strengthening exercises. Both twice a week for 6 weeks |
Low Back Pain Functional Scale: Significantly improved by 20% in experimental group and 15% in control group. No gender/age differences in results |
p < 0.05 |
(Chan et al., 2011) [15] |
46 NSCLBP patients (10 male, 36 female) |
8-week intervention. Both intervention and control groups received conventional physiotherapy. Intervention group only also prescribed aerobic exercise (40%–60% heart rate reserve) |
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Intervention group: 47% significant reduction post intervention. Control: 42% significant reduction post intervention. No gender/age differences in results |
p < 0.001 |
(Chatzitheodorou et al., 2007) [17] |
20 NSCLBP patients (11 male, 9 female). Excludes patients with BMI > 30 |
12-week intervention. Exercise group: high intensity aerobic exercise (running on treadmill at 85% of heart rate reserve). Control group: Passive treatment (ultrasound and did not include any form of PA) |
McGill Pain Questionnaire. Exercise group: 41% significant reduction post intervention. Control: no significant change. No gender/age differences in results |
p < 0.001 |
(Chatzitheodorou et al., 2008) [18] |
64 NSCLBP patients (26 male, 38 female) Excludes patients with BMI > 30 |
Patients randomly allocated into positive or negative dexamethasone suppression test. Both groups completed 12-week aerobic exercise programme (running on treadmill at 85% heart rate reserve) |
McGill Pain Questionnaire. Positive suppression group: 30% significant reduction post intervention. Negative suppression group: 8% significant reduction post intervention. No gender/age differences in results |
p < 0.001 |