Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;240(11):1408–1415. doi: 10.1177/1535370215587532

Table 3.

Tumor development characteristics in relation to the level of physical training; Symbols indicate type of test used the analysis; significant P values are bolded

Variables SC group (n = 14) LIT group (n = 12) MIT group (n = 10) HIT group (n = 7) P Training Groups LIT + MIT + HIT (n = 29) SC vs. LIT + MIT  + HIT P
Number of tumors 22 13 4 3 0.16* 20 0.20
Number of affected rats 9 (64%) 8 (67%) P = 0.81 4 (40%) P = 0.28 3 (43%) P = 0.38 0.50* 15 (52%) 0.44§
Number of tumors per rat 1.57 1.1 P = 0.36 0.4 P = 0.04 0.4 P = 0.08 0.12* 0.68 0.04§
*

Kruskal–Wallis test.

Mann–Whitney test.

Dunnett’s test post hoc analysis.

§

Unpaired Student’s t-test