Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;240(4):546–555. doi: 10.1177/1535370215573463

Table 2.

Correlation of EZH2 expression with clinicopathological features in CRC

EZH2 expression
Clinicopathological parameters Case no. Low (%) High (%) P value
Total cases 42 9 (21.4) 33 (78.6)
Age >0.05
 ≤60 years 19 4 (21.1) 9 (78.9)
 >60 years 23 7 (30.0) 16 (70.0)
Gender >0.05
 Male 26 7 (27.0) 19 (73.0)
 Female 16 6 (37.5) 10 (72.5)
  BMI >0.05
  ≥30 kg/m2 8 2 (25.0) 6 (75.0)
  <30 kg/m2 34 7 (20.6) 27 (79.4)
Tumor size >0.05
 ≤5 cm 31 9 (29.0) 22 (71.0)
 >5 cm 11 2 (18.2) 9 (81.8)
Histological grade >0.05
 Well differentiated 10 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0)
 Moderate differentiated 18 5 (27.8) 13 (72.2)
 Poor differentiated 14 3 (21.4) 11 (78.6)
TNM stage <0.01
 I 8 7 (85.7) 1 (14.3)
 II 17 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7)
 III 12 2 (16.7) 10 (83.3)
 IV 5 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0)
Lymph node metastasis <0.01
 Positive 29 4 (13.8) 25 (86.2)
 Negative 13 6 (46.2) 7 (53.8)
Distant metastasis
 Positive 5 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) >0.05
 Negative 37 12 (32.4) 25 (67.6)

CRC, colorectal cancer; BMI, body mass index; TNM, tumor-lymph node-metastasis.