Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;240(4):458–466. doi: 10.1177/1535370214542215

Table 2.

Correlation of EZH2 expression with clinicopathological features in CRC

EZH2 expression
Clinicopathological parameters Case no. Low (%) High (%) P value
Total cases 42 9 (21.4) 33 (78.6)
Age >0.05
≤60 years 19 4 (21.1) 9 (78.9)
>60 years 23 7 (30.0) 16 (70.0)
Gender >0.05
Male 26 7 (27.0) 19 (73.0)
Female 16 6 (37.5) 10 (72.5)
BMI >0.05
≥30 kg/m2 <30 kg/m2 8 34 2 (25.0) 7 (20.6) 6 (75.0) 27 (79.4)
Tumor size >0.05
≤5 cm 31 9 (29.0) 22 (71.0)
>5 cm 11 2 (18.2) 9 (81.8)
Histological grade >0.05
Well differentiated 10 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0)
Moderate differentiated 18 5 (27.8) 13 (72.2)
Poor differentiated 14 3 (21.4) 11 (78.6)
TNM stage <0.01
I II 8 17 7 (85.7) 6 (35.3) 1 (14.3) 11 (64.7)
III IV 12 5 2 (16.7) 2 (40.0) 10 (83.3) 3 (60.0)
Lymph node metastasis <0.01
Positive 29 4 (13.8) 25 (86.2)
Negative 13 6 (46.2) 7 (53.8)
Distant metastasis >0.05
Positive Negative 5 37 2 (40.0) 12 (32.4) 3 (60.0) 25 (67.6)

BMI: body mass index; CRC: colorectal cancer; TNM: tumor-lymph node-metastasis.