Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Int J STD AIDS. 2013 May 6;24(1):34–38. doi: 10.1177/0956462412472300

Table 2.

HIV prevalence by type of female sex worker in the 2007 RDS survey compared with 2007 routine sentinel surveillance data, Bangkok, Thailand

Type of sex work 2007 RDS survey*
N, HIV prevalence
(%) (95% CI)
2007 Sentinel
surveillance survey
N, HIV prevalence
(%) (95% CI)
Venue based N = 163, 12.5 (6.2–19.9) N = 556, 2.5 (1.4–4.1)
Non-venue based N = 515, 22.7 (18.2–28.4) NA§
Total N = 678, 20.2 (16.4–24.7) N = 556, 2.5 (1.4–4.1)

FSW = female sex worker; RDS = respondent-driven sampling; RDSAT = RDS Analysis Tool

*

RDSAT-adjusted results

Venue based includes both ‘direct’ establishments (where there are rooms on the premises to be used by FSW with clients) and ‘indirect’ establishments (FSW and clients go elsewhere once a transactional agreement is made)

Non-venue based includes public spaces such as streets/intersections, bars, beauty parlours, parks, shopping malls, phone, etc

§

NA = Not available because routine sentinel surveillance surveys not conducted among non-venue-based FSW