Table 6. Interaction between RMR and the UCP3 variant in female nonagenarians explains FI34 after adjustment for muscle mass and physical activity.
| rs591758 | rs675547 | rs1626521 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
||||
| b | se | b | se | b | se | |
| FFM | -5.7e-3 ** | 2.1e-3 | -5.4e-3 * | 2.3e-3 | -3.6e-3 | 2.3e-3 |
| EESI | -9.7e-6 ** | 3.0e-6 | -1.1e-5 ** | 3.1e-6 | -1.2e-3 *** | 2.9e-6 |
| RMR | 3.1e-4 * | 1.5e-4 | 2.1e-4 | 1.7e-4 | 5.1e-6 | 1.5e-4 |
| SNP | -6.5e-2 | 9.7e-2 | -0.15 | 0.11 | -0.41 ** | 0.13 |
| RMRxSNP | 1.0e-4 | 9.5e-5 | 1.8e-4 | 1.0e-4 | 4.1e-4 ** | 1.3e-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| R2 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.52 | |||
| P | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | |||
b = regression coefficient
p ≤ 0.05,
p ≤ 0.01,
p ≤ 0.001);
se = standard error of b; FFM = fat-free mass; EESI= energy expenditure summary index in the Yale Physical Activity Survey; RMR = resting metabolic rate; SNP = additive genetic model for each SNP; R2= adjusted R2; P = p value of the coefficient of determination (R2) obtained by application of the F-statistic in analysis of variance; sample size (n = 37)